Mailing List Archive

+1 SUCCESS! [0:47:01.119384]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:24 PM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
>
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00
> UTC.
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> ----
>


--
Adrien

+0 SUCCESS! [0:39:31.979476]

I say +0 instead of +1, because i am still worried that we release
with a bugfix without any test.

I am happy to change vote to a +1 if we even have a hacky test in a
draft PR. the release artifacts don't need to contain such a test or
anything like that. i just want to run it, to verify that big vectors
segments work.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:24 AM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
>
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> ----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Hi,

Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java 17, still no Java 19 :(

SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
Finished: SUCCESS

I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the Bugfix looks fine.

+1 to release!

Uwe

Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>:
>Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
>
>
>The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
>You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
>
>python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
>Here is my +1
>
>----

--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de

Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into some
issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.

Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a monster
test you could try out: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It
requires downloading an external dataset based on some StackOverflow data
where I found the bug. Let me know if you run into problems with the test
-- maybe we can discuss on the draft PR.

Julie

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java 17,
> still no Java 19 :(
>
> SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
> Finished: SUCCESS
>
> I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the Bugfix
> looks fine.
>
> +1 to release!
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
> >:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
>>
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>>
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00
>> UTC.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> ----
>>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>

Thank you Julie for the draft test! I will try to reproduce/test with it.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Julie Tibshirani <julietibs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into some issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.
>
> Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a monster test you could try out: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It requires downloading an external dataset based on some StackOverflow data where I found the bug. Let me know if you run into problems with the test -- maybe we can discuss on the draft PR.
>
> Julie
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java 17, still no Java 19 :(
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
>> Finished: SUCCESS
>>
>> I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the Bugfix looks fine.
>>
>> +1 to release!
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
>>>
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>>>
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>> ----
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1

:lucene:core:test (SUCCESS): 1 test(s)

> Task :lucene:core:wipeTaskTemp
The slowest tests (exceeding 500 ms) during this run:
8511.54s TestManyKnnVectors.testLargeSegment (:lucene:core)
The slowest suites (exceeding 1s) during this run:
8512.27s TestManyKnnVectors (:lucene:core)

BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 2h 22m 55s
19 actionable tasks: 13 executed, 6 up-to-date

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you Julie for the draft test! I will try to reproduce/test with it.
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Julie Tibshirani <julietibs@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into some issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.
> >
> > Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a monster test you could try out: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It requires downloading an external dataset based on some StackOverflow data where I found the bug. Let me know if you run into problems with the test -- maybe we can discuss on the draft PR.
> >
> > Julie
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java 17, still no Java 19 :(
> >>
> >> SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
> >> Finished: SUCCESS
> >>
> >> I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the Bugfix looks fine.
> >>
> >> +1 to release!
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here is my +1
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>
> >> --
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> >> https://www.thetaphi.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

SUCCESS! [0:49:28.580122]

+1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:57 AM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
> 9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1
>
> :lucene:core:test (SUCCESS): 1 test(s)
>
> > Task :lucene:core:wipeTaskTemp
> The slowest tests (exceeding 500 ms) during this run:
> 8511.54s TestManyKnnVectors.testLargeSegment (:lucene:core)
> The slowest suites (exceeding 1s) during this run:
> 8512.27s TestManyKnnVectors (:lucene:core)
>
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 2h 22m 55s
> 19 actionable tasks: 13 executed, 6 up-to-date
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Julie for the draft test! I will try to reproduce/test with it.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Julie Tibshirani <julietibs@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into some issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.
> > >
> > > Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a monster test you could try out: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It requires downloading an external dataset based on some StackOverflow data where I found the bug. Let me know if you run into problems with the test -- maybe we can discuss on the draft PR.
> > >
> > > Julie
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java 17, still no Java 19 :(
> > >>
> > >> SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
> > >> Finished: SUCCESS
> > >>
> > >> I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the Bugfix looks fine.
> > >>
> > >> +1 to release!
> > >>
> > >> Uwe
> > >>
> > >> Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >>>
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is my +1
> > >>>
> > >>> ----
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Uwe Schindler
> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

SUCCESS! [0:47:29.586134]

+ 1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:33 AM Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com> wrote:

> SUCCESS! [0:49:28.580122]
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:57 AM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
> > 9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1
> >
> > :lucene:core:test (SUCCESS): 1 test(s)
> >
> > > Task :lucene:core:wipeTaskTemp
> > The slowest tests (exceeding 500 ms) during this run:
> > 8511.54s TestManyKnnVectors.testLargeSegment (:lucene:core)
> > The slowest suites (exceeding 1s) during this run:
> > 8512.27s TestManyKnnVectors (:lucene:core)
> >
> > BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 2h 22m 55s
> > 19 actionable tasks: 13 executed, 6 up-to-date
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you Julie for the draft test! I will try to reproduce/test with
> it.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Julie Tibshirani <julietibs@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into
> some issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.
> > > >
> > > > Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a
> monster test you could try out:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It requires downloading an
> external dataset based on some StackOverflow data where I found the bug.
> Let me know if you run into problems with the test -- maybe we can discuss
> on the draft PR.
> > > >
> > > > Julie
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Policeman Jenkins ran the smoke checks for me with Java 11 and Java
> 17, still no Java 19 :(
> > > >>
> > > >> SUCCESS! [1:26:17.692239]
> > > >> Finished: SUCCESS
> > > >>
> > > >> I did not do any special checks beyond smoke tester. To me the
> Bugfix looks fine.
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 to release!
> > > >>
> > > >> Uwe
> > > >>
> > > >> Am 20. Oktober 2022 16:24:23 MESZ schrieb Ignacio Vera <
> iverase@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23
> 15:00 UTC.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Here is my +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Uwe Schindler
> > > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> > > >> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>