This vote has failed, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234
.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:43 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
> Re-reading I think I misunderstood. I thought somewhere it was said that
> git repo was needed to build which I would consider important, but I guess
> that was just re-building the src tarball itself that required it.
>
> If the existing src tarball is sufficient to produce a working server
> based solely on instructions in the README.md I have no further concerns.
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The basic build steps are included in the readme, Gus -
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/#building-with-gradle
>>
>> Is your comment about moving it to a separate file or about the
>> instructions to build the package in general? If it's the latter then
>> I think it's fine?
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:16 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Not suggesting it's a show stopper, just that this would be an easily
>> found and consumed way to document the information revealed in this
>> discussion.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:13 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The same applies for the historical time. It was never possible to do
>> a full release with only the source tarball.
>> >>
>> >> The only thing that does not work is: assembleSourceRelease, because
>> it requires "git archive" to build the src.tgz. But why should anybody do
>> this? You have a src.tgz already why create another one from itsself?
>> >>
>> >> You can create a binary release without problems (at least that worked
>> yesterday), it will just not have a git hash in the metadata of JAR files
>> (and so on). But the version number is always "SNAPSHOT" unless you define
>> your own (we do this to prevent "unauthorized artifacts created
>> accidentally). If somebody wants to release a custom Lucene with patches,
>> one can pass -Dversion.suffix="Ubuntu20.04-foobar" to make a customized
>> release.
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
>> >> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM
>> >> > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't think it's a showstopper. This applies to any 9x branch -
>> >> > perhaps starting from main. We can extract these instructions into a
>> >> > separate document. On the other hand, it wouldn't be shown up there
>> on
>> >> > github front-page then... and times have changed - this is where most
>> >> > folks would probably end up reading the instructions, not the source
>> >> > bundle?
>> >> >
>> >> > D.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:01 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Seems to me the details for how to turn a src tarball into
>> something that can
>> >> > be compiled should go in a BUILDING.txt file?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:00 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:17:23.949074]
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> +1.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> D.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:31 PM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> >> > >> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-
>> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> >> > >> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-
>> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-30 9:00 UTC.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve
>> >> > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >> > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Here is my +1.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > --
>> >> > >> > Adrien
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> >> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>
--
Adrien
.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:43 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
> Re-reading I think I misunderstood. I thought somewhere it was said that
> git repo was needed to build which I would consider important, but I guess
> that was just re-building the src tarball itself that required it.
>
> If the existing src tarball is sufficient to produce a working server
> based solely on instructions in the README.md I have no further concerns.
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The basic build steps are included in the readme, Gus -
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/#building-with-gradle
>>
>> Is your comment about moving it to a separate file or about the
>> instructions to build the package in general? If it's the latter then
>> I think it's fine?
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:16 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Not suggesting it's a show stopper, just that this would be an easily
>> found and consumed way to document the information revealed in this
>> discussion.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:13 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The same applies for the historical time. It was never possible to do
>> a full release with only the source tarball.
>> >>
>> >> The only thing that does not work is: assembleSourceRelease, because
>> it requires "git archive" to build the src.tgz. But why should anybody do
>> this? You have a src.tgz already why create another one from itsself?
>> >>
>> >> You can create a binary release without problems (at least that worked
>> yesterday), it will just not have a git hash in the metadata of JAR files
>> (and so on). But the version number is always "SNAPSHOT" unless you define
>> your own (we do this to prevent "unauthorized artifacts created
>> accidentally). If somebody wants to release a custom Lucene with patches,
>> one can pass -Dversion.suffix="Ubuntu20.04-foobar" to make a customized
>> release.
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
>> >> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM
>> >> > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't think it's a showstopper. This applies to any 9x branch -
>> >> > perhaps starting from main. We can extract these instructions into a
>> >> > separate document. On the other hand, it wouldn't be shown up there
>> on
>> >> > github front-page then... and times have changed - this is where most
>> >> > folks would probably end up reading the instructions, not the source
>> >> > bundle?
>> >> >
>> >> > D.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:01 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Seems to me the details for how to turn a src tarball into
>> something that can
>> >> > be compiled should go in a BUILDING.txt file?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:00 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:17:23.949074]
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> +1.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> D.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:31 PM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> >> > >> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-
>> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> >> > >> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-
>> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-30 9:00 UTC.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve
>> >> > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >> > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Here is my +1.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > --
>> >> > >> > Adrien
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> >> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>
--
Adrien