Mailing List Archive

+1 SUCCESS! [0:20:30.247277]

Ran smoketester and browsed around the archives. Lincense and Notice on top-level of src dist looks good.

Tested launching Luke from bin/luke.sh - OK
Minor: Luke started on macOS Monterey complains about Times font not being available:
> Warning: the fonts "Times" and "Times" are not available for the Java logical font "Serif", which may have unexpected appearance or behavior. Re-enable the "Times" font to remove this warning.


Minor: README.md in binary dist says "The following sub-folders are included in the binary distribution of Lucene: bin/, modules/, modules-thirdparty/, licenses/". But it fails to mention "docs/" and "modules-test-framework/"

Jan

> 23. nov. 2021 kl. 09:40 skrev Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.

Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
same as before.
So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
compatibility can't be guaranteed.
Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
commitment that we have to take seriously.
At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
to fully remove a mistake, for example.

So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
release and java 1.4 and so on.

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.
>
> Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
> same as before.
> So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
> compatibility can't be guaranteed.
> Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
> commitment that we have to take seriously.
> At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
> to fully remove a mistake, for example.
>
> So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
> backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
> release and java 1.4 and so on.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

I ran the smoke tester to SUCCESS! - sorry, I lost the timing in my
terminal scrollback, but it is so fast :) Also ran unit tests of our
service after upgrading, and although there are some fails, it all
looks like we are stumbling over our own feet - not Lucene issues.

+1 to release

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798]
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
>> same as before.
>> So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
>> compatibility can't be guaranteed.
>> Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
>> commitment that we have to take seriously.
>> At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
>> to fully remove a mistake, for example.
>>
>> So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
>> backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
>> release and java 1.4 and so on.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>> >
>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>> >
>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >
>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>> >
>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > Here is my +1
>> >
>> > --
>> > Adrien
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

and ... now all the tests are passing; no change to Lucene needed.

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 5:22 PM Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I ran the smoke tester to SUCCESS! - sorry, I lost the timing in my
> terminal scrollback, but it is so fast :) Also ran unit tests of our
> service after upgrading, and although there are some fails, it all
> looks like we are stumbling over our own feet - not Lucene issues.
>
> +1 to release
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798]
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
> >> same as before.
> >> So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
> >> compatibility can't be guaranteed.
> >> Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
> >> commitment that we have to take seriously.
> >> At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
> >> to fully remove a mistake, for example.
> >>
> >> So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
> >> backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
> >> release and java 1.4 and so on.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
> >> >
> >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >> >
> >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> >
> >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >
> >> > Here is my +1
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Adrien
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Hi Jan,
thanks for testing and reporting it.

> Minor: Luke started on macOS Monterey complains about Times font not being available:
> Warning: the fonts "Times" and "Times" are not available for the Java logical font "Serif", which may have unexpected appearance or behavior. Re-enable the "Times" font to remove this warning.

I opened an issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10256

I can't reproduce it, for now, but it seems not to be critical to run
a program that depends on Serif fonts.
https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/1571348-why-do-i-receive-the-error-warning-the-font-times-is-not-available-when-starting-matlab-on-maco

Tomoko

2021?11?24?(?) 7:35 Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com>:
>
> and ... now all the tests are passing; no change to Lucene needed.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 5:22 PM Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I ran the smoke tester to SUCCESS! - sorry, I lost the timing in my
> > terminal scrollback, but it is so fast :) Also ran unit tests of our
> > service after upgrading, and although there are some fails, it all
> > looks like we are stumbling over our own feet - not Lucene issues.
> >
> > +1 to release
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.
> > >>
> > >> Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
> > >> same as before.
> > >> So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
> > >> compatibility can't be guaranteed.
> > >> Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
> > >> commitment that we have to take seriously.
> > >> At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
> > >> to fully remove a mistake, for example.
> > >>
> > >> So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
> > >> backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
> > >> release and java 1.4 and so on.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
> > >> >
> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> > >> >
> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >> >
> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> > >> >
> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 approve
> > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >> >
> > >> > Here is my +1
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Adrien
> > >> >
> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

SUCCESS! [0:17:25.661795]

I checked Windows artifacts and scripts.

+1.

Dawid

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

+1

SUCCESS! [0:21:35.63292]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:10 PM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


--
Regards,

Atri
Apache Concerted

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Hi,

although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console

...my manual review ran into problems:
- Luke did not start for me, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259 (fix is easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is fatal!

So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g. smoketester should check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).

What looks fine:
- Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
- Licenses are OK
- The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.

Home dir is also good.

I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
> To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
> 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
> 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Thanks Uwe, let's consider this vote failed.

On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis
UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console
>
> ...my manual review ran into problems:
> - Luke did not start for me, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259 (fix is easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is fatal!
>
> So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g. smoketester should check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).
>
> What looks fine:
> - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
> - Licenses are OK
> - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.
>
> Home dir is also good.
>
> I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
> > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


--
Adrien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

I found another bug in Luke:





Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.



This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open issue.



-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

https://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de



> -----Original Message-----

> From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>

> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM

> To: dev@lucene.apache.org

> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

>

> Hi,

>

> although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:

> <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console

>

> ...my manual review ran into problems:

> - Luke did not start for me, see <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> > 10259 (fix is easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it

> uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is

> fatal!

>

> So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g. smoketester should

> check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).

>

> What looks fine:

> - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine

> - Licenses are OK

> - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.

>

> Home dir is also good.

>

> I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one

> available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????

>

> Uwe

>

> -----

> Uwe Schindler

> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

> <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de

> eMail: <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de

>

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: Adrien Grand < <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com> jpountz@gmail.com>

> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM

> > To: Lucene Dev < <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> dev@lucene.apache.org>

> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

> >

> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0

> >

> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:

> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-

> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75

> >

> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

> >

> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-

> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75

> >

> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.

> >

> > [ ] +1 approve

> > [ ] +0 no opinion

> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

> >

> > Here is my +1

> >

> > --

> > Adrien

> >

> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org

>

>

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org

See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260



-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

<https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de



From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2



I found another bug in Luke:





Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.



This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open issue.



-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

https://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>



> -----Original Message-----

> From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> >

> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM

> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>

> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

>

> Hi,

>

> although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:

> <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console

>

> ...my manual review ran into problems:

> - Luke did not start for me, see <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> > 10259 (fix is easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it

> uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is

> fatal!

>

> So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g. smoketester should

> check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).

>

> What looks fine:

> - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine

> - Licenses are OK

> - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.

>

> Home dir is also good.

>

> I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one

> available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????

>

> Uwe

>

> -----

> Uwe Schindler

> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

> <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de

> eMail: <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de

>

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: Adrien Grand < <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com> jpountz@gmail.com>

> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM

> > To: Lucene Dev < <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> dev@lucene.apache.org>

> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

> >

> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0

> >

> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:

> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-

> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75

> >

> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

> >

> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-

> > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75

> >

> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.

> >

> > [ ] +1 approve

> > [ ] +0 no opinion

> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

> >

> > Here is my +1

> >

> > --

> > Adrien

> >

> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org

>

>

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org> dev-help@lucene.apache.org

> On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis
> UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?

Rather than making the old UI work with the module system, I would remove
it (at least for now).
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/475

Could I backport it to branch_9_0?

Tomoko


2021?11?25?(?) 3:46 Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:

> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>
>
>
> I found another bug in Luke:
>
>
>
> Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class
> LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.
>
>
>
> This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open issue.
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM
>
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>
> >
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
>
> > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console
>
> >
>
> > ...my manual review ran into problems:
>
> > - Luke did not start for me, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259>
>
> > 10259 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> (fix is
> easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it
>
> > uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is
>
> > fatal!
>
> >
>
> > So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g.
> smoketester should
>
> > check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).
>
> >
>
> > What looks fine:
>
> > - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
>
> > - Licenses are OK
>
> > - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.
>
> >
>
> > Home dir is also good.
>
> >
>
> > I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one
>
> > available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????
>
> >
>
> > Uwe
>
> >
>
> > -----
>
> > Uwe Schindler
>
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> >
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
>
> > > From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
>
> > > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>
> > >
>
> > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>
> > >
>
> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>
> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> > >
>
> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> > >
>
> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>
> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>
> > >
>
> > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>
> > >
>
> > > [ ] +1 approve
>
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> > >
>
> > > Here is my +1
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > Adrien
>
> > >
>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

Sorry Tomoko I'm just seeing your message now. Please go ahead and backport
to branch_9_0.

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis
> > UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?
>
> Rather than making the old UI work with the module system, I would remove
> it (at least for now).
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/475
>
> Could I backport it to branch_9_0?
>
> Tomoko
>
>
> 2021?11?25?(?) 3:46 Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>
>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM
>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>
>>
>>
>> I found another bug in Luke:
>>
>>
>>
>> Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class
>> LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open
>> issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>>
>> > From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM
>>
>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> >
>>
>> > although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
>>
>> > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ...my manual review ran into problems:
>>
>> > - Luke did not start for me, see
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259>
>>
>> > 10259 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> (fix is
>> easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it
>>
>> > uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which
>> is
>>
>> > fatal!
>>
>> >
>>
>> > So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g.
>> smoketester should
>>
>> > check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).
>>
>> >
>>
>> > What looks fine:
>>
>> > - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
>>
>> > - Licenses are OK
>>
>> > - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Home dir is also good.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene
>> one
>>
>> > available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Uwe
>>
>> >
>>
>> > -----
>>
>> > Uwe Schindler
>>
>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>
>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>
>> > > From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>>
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
>>
>> > > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>
>> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>
>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>
>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Here is my +1
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > --
>>
>> > > Adrien
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>

--
Adrien

Hi,

I think all Luke-related blockers or issues were resolved. Other minor
issues that come from (partially) adopting the module system could pop up,
they will be handled in future releases.

Thanks,
Tomoko


2021?11?26?(?) 2:29 Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>:

> Sorry Tomoko I'm just seeing your message now. Please go ahead and
> backport to branch_9_0.
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tomoko Uchida <
> tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis
>> > UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?
>>
>> Rather than making the old UI work with the module system, I would remove
>> it (at least for now).
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/475
>>
>> Could I backport it to branch_9_0?
>>
>> Tomoko
>>
>>
>> 2021?11?25?(?) 3:46 Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>>
>>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM
>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I found another bug in Luke:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class
>>> LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open
>>> issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> > From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>>
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM
>>>
>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
>>>
>>> > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > ...my manual review ran into problems:
>>>
>>> > - Luke did not start for me, see
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259>
>>>
>>> > 10259 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> (fix is
>>> easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it
>>>
>>> > uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which
>>> is
>>>
>>> > fatal!
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g.
>>> smoketester should
>>>
>>> > check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > What looks fine:
>>>
>>> > - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
>>>
>>> > - Licenses are OK
>>>
>>> > - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Home dir is also good.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene
>>> one
>>>
>>> > available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Uwe
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > -----
>>>
>>> > Uwe Schindler
>>>
>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>
>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> > > From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
>>>
>>> > > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>>
>>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>>
>>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>
>>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>
>>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Here is my +1
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > --
>>>
>>> > > Adrien
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrien
>

+1 Thanks Tomoko.

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:51 AM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think all Luke-related blockers or issues were resolved. Other minor
> issues that come from (partially) adopting the module system could pop up,
> they will be handled in future releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Tomoko
>
>
> 2021?11?26?(?) 2:29 Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>:
>
>> Sorry Tomoko I'm just seeing your message now. Please go ahead and
>> backport to branch_9_0.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tomoko Uchida <
>> tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis
>>> > UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?
>>>
>>> Rather than making the old UI work with the module system, I would
>>> remove it (at least for now).
>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/475
>>>
>>> Could I backport it to branch_9_0?
>>>
>>> Tomoko
>>>
>>>
>>> 2021?11?25?(?) 3:46 Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>>>
>>>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>
>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM
>>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I found another bug in Luke:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class
>>>> LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>
>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> > From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>>>
>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM
>>>>
>>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > Hi,
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins:
>>>>
>>>> > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > ...my manual review ran into problems:
>>>>
>>>> > - Luke did not start for me, see
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259>
>>>>
>>>> > 10259 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> (fix is
>>>> easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it
>>>>
>>>> > uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message
>>>> which is
>>>>
>>>> > fatal!
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g.
>>>> smoketester should
>>>>
>>>> > check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker).
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > What looks fine:
>>>>
>>>> > - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine
>>>>
>>>> > - Licenses are OK
>>>>
>>>> > - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > Home dir is also good.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene
>>>> one
>>>>
>>>> > available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too ????
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > Uwe
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > -----
>>>>
>>>> > Uwe Schindler
>>>>
>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>
>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> > > From: Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM
>>>>
>>>> > > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>>>
>>>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-
>>>>
>>>> > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>>
>>>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>
>>>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > > --
>>>>
>>>> > > Adrien
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>

--
Adrien