Mailing List Archive

Review request - New Solr website
Hi,

I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.

The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/

Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.

Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
I clicked around a bit; didn't do a thorough copy edit or anything,
but it seems as if the links are working, content looks accurate. The
notices about the new TLP seem good to me, too. Thanks for forging
ahead, Jan

-Mike

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:56 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>
> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>
> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>
> Jan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Thanks for doing this Jan!

Some quick feedback on the Lucene site:
* The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems
off to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small
or immature to warrant it previously.
* IMO with Solr gone, the Lucene-core content should not be just some
sub-page but should move into the front page. The front page would then
have the tabs that Lucene-core has. PyLucene could be another tab.

Solr side:
* I like the note that shows up immediately to alert the user of the
switch! I see that it doesn't re-appear on every return (e.g. due to a
cookie)? I imagine we will stop doing this in a year or maybe sooner.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:03 PM Michael Sokolov <msokolov@gmail.com> wrote:

> I clicked around a bit; didn't do a thorough copy edit or anything,
> but it seems as if the links are working, content looks accurate. The
> notices about the new TLP seem good to me, too. Thanks for forging
> ahead, Jan
>
> -Mike
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:56 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499
> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> > I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review
> before I actually publish the changes.
> >
> > The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> > The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish
> the new sites in a couple of days.
> >
> > Jan
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
I noticed that the Ref Guide is missing from the new site. Is this
something that we will have to figure out how to restore after the site
goes live?

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:56 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499
> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review
> before I actually publish the changes.
>
> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>
> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish
> the new sites in a couple of days.
>
> Jan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Looks good.

I wonder if there is a way to bring the Reference Guide more
prominently to the home page. Maybe even in the top "Learn More"
section or even a section of its own right after.

I also wonder if the book section is so out-of-date (in terms of Solr)
that it should retreat to the Documentation page.

We are also linking to CWiki still in the Social Proof section (Visit
Solr's Public Servers listing page to learn more), I wonder if we
should eliminate that link, at least from the home page as part of
CWiki purge. On the other hand, that seems like a useful page and not
completely out of date.

Regards,
Alex.

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 03:56, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>
> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>
> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>
> Jan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
> David:
> * The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems off to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small or immature to warrant it previously.

I think you are right. I'll find a better wording. I've replaced graduated --> moved for now. https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/cf893ddca1c04e336966d789d7f0cb72c1531294 Feel free to suggest better wording.

> * IMO with Solr gone, the Lucene-core content should not be just some sub-page but should move into the front page. The front page would then have the tabs that Lucene-core has. PyLucene could be another tab.

Perhaps. But let's make that another JIRA that Lucene can do later. For the Solr move I like to just surgically remove Solr and leave it with that.

> * I like the note that shows up immediately to alert the user of the switch! I see that it doesn't re-appear on every return (e.g. due to a cookie)? I imagine we will stop doing this in a year or maybe sooner.

Yep, it's a cookie. Good idea to only show the popup the first year. I have now put that in - https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/a694482032bc300440905936c8fccf9a37b39aea

> Mike:
> I noticed that the Ref Guide is missing from the new site. Is this something that we will have to figure out how to restore after the site goes live?


It is a slightly bigger task, so I extracted it in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177.

Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Thanks for feedback Alexandre.

These sound like good proposals, but probably well suited as followup cleanup after the site move.
Or you can make a PR against the "main/solr" branch if you want to merge it in from day one.

I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it?

Jam

> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 23:16 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>:
>
> Looks good.
>
> I wonder if there is a way to bring the Reference Guide more
> prominently to the home page. Maybe even in the top "Learn More"
> section or even a section of its own right after.
>
> I also wonder if the book section is so out-of-date (in terms of Solr)
> that it should retreat to the Documentation page.
>
> We are also linking to CWiki still in the Social Proof section (Visit
> Solr's Public Servers listing page to learn more), I wonder if we
> should eliminate that link, at least from the home page as part of
> CWiki purge. On the other hand, that seems like a useful page and not
> completely out of date.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 03:56, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>>
>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>>
>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>>
>> Jan
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
> I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it?
Sorry, I meant our continual attempts to reduce its importance in
favour of other options and reduction of (out of date) pages it has.
But, if there are no better options...

Regards,
Alex.

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 17:30, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for feedback Alexandre.
>
> These sound like good proposals, but probably well suited as followup cleanup after the site move.
> Or you can make a PR against the "main/solr" branch if you want to merge it in from day one.
>

>
> Jam
>
> > 1. mar. 2021 kl. 23:16 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Looks good.
> >
> > I wonder if there is a way to bring the Reference Guide more
> > prominently to the home page. Maybe even in the top "Learn More"
> > section or even a section of its own right after.
> >
> > I also wonder if the book section is so out-of-date (in terms of Solr)
> > that it should retreat to the Documentation page.
> >
> > We are also linking to CWiki still in the Social Proof section (Visit
> > Solr's Public Servers listing page to learn more), I wonder if we
> > should eliminate that link, at least from the home page as part of
> > CWiki purge. On the other hand, that seems like a useful page and not
> > completely out of date.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 03:56, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> >> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
> >>
> >> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> >> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >>
> >> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".

The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.

The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
* The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
* If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?

Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.

Jan

> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>
> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>
> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>
> Jan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a
broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page:
https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is
not an issue because
once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work"
maybe?

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:

> On the new "Project" page (
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted
> to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>
> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names,
> which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at
> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative
> list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new
> committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>
> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some
> questions:
> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should
> the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>
> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is
> not my 1st language.
>
> Jan
>
> > 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499
> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> > I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review
> before I actually publish the changes.
> >
> > The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> > The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish
> the new sites in a couple of days.
> >
> > Jan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.

Jan

> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
>
> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html> -- likely this is not an issue because
> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html>) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>
> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr> for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>
> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>
> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>
> Jan
>
> > 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> > I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
> >
> > The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org <http://solr.apache.org/> is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/>
> > The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/>
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >
> > Jan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>
RE: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Hi,



Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).



Uwe



-----

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

https://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de



From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website



Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.



Jan





2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com> >:



Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is not an issue because

once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?




Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>





On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com> > wrote:

On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".

The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.

The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
* The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
* If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?

Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.

Jan

> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com> >:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>
> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org <http://solr.apache.org/> is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>
> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>
> Jan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.

The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but will once we publish.

I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.

Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site

Jan

> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>
>
> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
>
> Jan
>
>
>> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>>:
>>
>> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html> -- likely this is not an issue because
>> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
>>> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html>) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>>>
>>> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr> for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>>>
>>> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
>>> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
>>> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>>>
>>> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> > 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>>> > I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>>> >
>>> > The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org <http://solr.apache.org/> is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/>
>>> > The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/>
>>> >
>>> > Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>>> >
>>> > Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
Would have been nice to track the moment of split.

Regards,
Alex.

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.
>
> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but will once we publish.
>
> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
>
> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site
>
> Jan
>
> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
>
> Jan
>
>
> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
>
> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is not an issue because
> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>
> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>
> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>
> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>
> Jan
>
> > 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> > I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
> >
> > The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> > The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >
> > Jan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows anything about.
I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?

Jan

> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>:
>
> Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
> Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>
>> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.
>>
>> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but will once we publish.
>>
>> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
>> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
>>
>> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
>>
>> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is not an issue because
>> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>
>> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>>
>> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>>
>> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
>> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
>> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>>
>> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>>>
>>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
>>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>>>
>>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>>>
>>> Jan
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Is there an ASF GA account we could use?

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:

> You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows
> anything about.
> I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?
>
> Jan
>
> > 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
> > Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene
> side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.
> >>
> >> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g.
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to
> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but
> will once we publish.
> >>
> >> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then
> afterwards the new Lucene site.
> >> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
> >>
> >> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the
> main/solr and main/lucene branches at
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-site
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be
> seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s
> new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion
> production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
> >>
> >> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of
> the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the
> site is published to the final location.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
> >>
> >> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit
> a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page:
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is
> not an issue because
> >> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work"
> maybe?
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On the new "Project" page (
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted
> to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
> >>
> >> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of
> names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at
> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative
> list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new
> committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
> >>
> >> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some
> questions:
> >> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need
> to?
> >> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should
> the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
> >>
> >> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is
> not my 1st language.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have been working on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate
> website for Solr.
> >>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader
> review before I actually publish the changes.
> >>>
> >>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> >>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >>>
> >>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to
> publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
ASF dont want us to use any user tracking - they tell us to get stats from INFRA based on httpd logs. But they currently don't track downloads (i.e redirects to mirrors).
So I don't expect any ASF help.

I'm setting up a GA account for Solr and will invite any PMC member to manage that account.
I have sent an email to check whether anyone known anything about the existing Lucene account.

Jan

> 3. mar. 2021 kl. 09:33 skrev Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>:
>
> Is there an ASF GA account we could use?
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
> You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows anything about.
> I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?
>
> Jan
>
> > 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com <mailto:arafalov@gmail.com>>:
> >
> > Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
> > Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177>) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171>) -- hopefully.
> >>
> >> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/> redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ <https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/> which currently does not exist but will once we publish.
> >>
> >> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
> >> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
> >>
> >> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site <https://github.com/apache/lucene-site>
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>
> >>
> >> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
> >>
> >> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>>:
> >>
> >> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html> -- likely this is not an issue because
> >> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html>) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
> >>
> >> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr> for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
> >>
> >> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
> >> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
> >> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
> >>
> >> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
> >>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
> >>>
> >>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org <http://solr.apache.org/> is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/>
> >>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/>
> >>>
> >>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Wrt the emeritus lists, I just copied them from Lucene for now, please see https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html

Jan

> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 16:32 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>
> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>
> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>
> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>
> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>
> Jan
>
>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>>
>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>>
>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>>
>> Jan
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
Privacy policy on the web sites (I copied Lucene's to the new Solr site)

https://lucene.apache.org/privacy.html
https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/privacy.html

Jan


> 3. mar. 2021 kl. 09:49 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>
> ASF dont want us to use any user tracking - they tell us to get stats from INFRA based on httpd logs. But they currently don't track downloads (i.e redirects to mirrors).
> So I don't expect any ASF help.
>
> I'm setting up a GA account for Solr and will invite any PMC member to manage that account.
> I have sent an email to check whether anyone known anything about the existing Lucene account.
>
> Jan
>
>> 3. mar. 2021 kl. 09:33 skrev Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net>>:
>>
>> Is there an ASF GA account we could use?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
>> You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows anything about.
>> I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> > 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com <mailto:arafalov@gmail.com>>:
>> >
>> > Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
>> > Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alex.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177>) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171>) -- hopefully.
>> >>
>> >> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/> redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ <https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/> which currently does not exist but will once we publish.
>> >>
>> >> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
>> >> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
>> >>
>> >> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site <https://github.com/apache/lucene-site>
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>>:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> >> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
>> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>
>> >>
>> >> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
>> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>>:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html> -- likely this is not an issue because
>> >> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>> >>
>> >> Mike McCandless
>> >>
>> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html>) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>> >>
>> >> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr> for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>> >>
>> >> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
>> >> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
>> >> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>> >>
>> >> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499> to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>> >>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>> >>>
>> >>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org <http://solr.apache.org/> is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/>
>> >>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/ <https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/>
>> >>>
>> >>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>
Re: Review request - New Solr website [ In reply to ]
The Solr website looks great, thanks for doing this Jan. +1 from me.

Jason

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:23 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> Privacy policy on the web sites (I copied Lucene's to the new Solr site)
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/privacy.html
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/privacy.html
>
> Jan
>
>
> 3. mar. 2021 kl. 09:49 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>
> ASF dont want us to use any user tracking - they tell us to get stats from INFRA based on httpd logs. But they currently don't track downloads (i.e redirects to mirrors).
> So I don't expect any ASF help.
>
> I'm setting up a GA account for Solr and will invite any PMC member to manage that account.
> I have sent an email to check whether anyone known anything about the existing Lucene account.
>
> Jan
>
> 3. mar. 2021 kl. 09:33 skrev Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>:
>
> Is there an ASF GA account we could use?
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>
>> You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows anything about.
>> I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> > 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
>> > Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alex.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.
>> >>
>> >> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g. https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but will once we publish.
>> >>
>> >> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then afterwards the new Lucene site.
>> >> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
>> >>
>> >> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the main/solr and main/lucene branches at https://github.com/apache/lucene-site
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >>
>> >> From: Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
>> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is published to the final location.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page: https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is not an issue because
>> >> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work" maybe?
>> >>
>> >> Mike McCandless
>> >>
>> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On the new "Project" page (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
>> >>
>> >> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
>> >>
>> >> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some questions:
>> >> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need to?
>> >> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
>> >>
>> >> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is not my 1st language.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr.
>> >>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes.
>> >>>
>> >>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
>> >>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
>> >>>
>> >>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to publish the new sites in a couple of days.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org