Mailing List Archive

Makes sense. I see you haven't commented on the issue about this; I prefer
that tactic as it gets noticed by everyone "Watching" the original issue,
even if it's old.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:14 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:

> I noticed today that SOLR-10883 added checks for patterns that didn't play
> nice with PDF generation. Now that we don't generate the PDF anymore
> perhaps we can do away with those checks? Anyone have thoughts to the
> contrary?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10883
>
> -Gus
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>

Sure I can do that. Was going to file an issue and link. I think adding a
link sends a mail to the linked issue, but I could be wrong.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:57 AM David Smiley <dsmiley@apache.org> wrote:

> Makes sense. I see you haven't commented on the issue about this; I
> prefer that tactic as it gets noticed by everyone "Watching" the original
> issue, even if it's old.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:14 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I noticed today that SOLR-10883 added checks for patterns that didn't
>> play nice with PDF generation. Now that we don't generate the PDF anymore
>> perhaps we can do away with those checks? Anyone have thoughts to the
>> contrary?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10883
>>
>> -Gus
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>

--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)