Mailing List Archive

Thanks Houston.

SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]

+1

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>

SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]

And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and
added a document - success :)

+1

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Houston.
>
> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>

--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
local 15 node cluster.

The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.

[image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]

- Houston

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:

> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>
> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and
> added a document - success :)
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Houston.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>>> UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>

Houston,

I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because of
my failure seen here:

[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest (suite)
[junit4] -
org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
{p0=STREAM}
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
[junit4]
[junit4]
[junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
[junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
[junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
[junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
[junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
[junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)

BUILD FAILED
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
89F99D88F5DFDCFA]

Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds

Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed mode)


I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????

Marcus

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
> local 15 node cluster.
>
> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>
> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>
> - Houston
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>
>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and
>> added a document - success :)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>

--
Marcus Eagan

Wow, it took 7 hours to run the tests on a 4 core machine! I think it is a
testament to how broken our tests are. I think re running the tests should
so the trick, unless it is another unlucky run.

On Wed, 12 Aug, 2020, 3:51 am Marcus Eagan, <marcuseagan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Houston,
>
> I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because of
> my failure seen here:
>
> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest (suite)
> [junit4] -
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
> {p0=STREAM}
> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
> [junit4]
> [junit4]
> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
> [junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
> suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
> errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
> 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]
>
> Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds
>
> Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
> openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed mode)
>
>
> I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????
>
> Marcus
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
>> local 15 node cluster.
>>
>> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
>> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>>
>> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>>
>> - Houston
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>>
>>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and
>>> added a document - success :)
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>
>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>
>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>>>>> 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Marcus Eagan
>
>

Failed again, and on a separate test. I've seen this test fail before. It
also seems germane to the recent fixes.

[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]:
[junit4] -
org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger
[junit4]
[junit4]
[junit4] JVM J0: 0.92 .. 2272.95 = 2272.02s
[junit4] JVM J1: 0.92 .. 2273.58 = 2272.66s
[junit4] JVM J2: 0.92 .. 2273.05 = 2272.13s
[junit4] JVM J3: 0.92 .. 2272.92 = 2272.00s
[junit4] Execution time total: 37 minutes 53 seconds
[junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
571 ignored (530 assumptions)

BUILD FAILED
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
571 ignored (530 assumptions) [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]

Total time: 38 minutes 30 seconds

To me, it seems like for the health of the project three or four committers
should be helping Erickson out with these tests. The flakiness is
frustrating.

reiterating, on the basis of my test results, -1 (non-binding)

Best,
Marcus

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wow, it took 7 hours to run the tests on a 4 core machine! I think it is a
> testament to how broken our tests are. I think re running the tests should
> so the trick, unless it is another unlucky run.
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug, 2020, 3:51 am Marcus Eagan, <marcuseagan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Houston,
>>
>> I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because of
>> my failure seen here:
>>
>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest (suite)
>> [junit4] -
>> org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
>> {p0=STREAM}
>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
>> [junit4]
>> [junit4]
>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>> [junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
>> suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
>> errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
>> 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]
>>
>> Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds
>>
>> Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
>> openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed
>> mode)
>>
>>
>> I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
>>> local 15 node cluster.
>>>
>>> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
>>> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>>>
>>> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>>>
>>> - Houston
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>>>
>>>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and
>>>> added a document - success :)
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>>>
>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>>>>>> 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcus Eagan
>>
>>

--
Marcus Eagan

That test method has a 1% fail rate on
http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html and shows up in
BadApple report emails and in fucit.org since a very long time ago (
http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/history-trend-of-recent-failures.html#series/org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger).
Can you compare the output from your run vs the logs in fucit.org there and
see if this is similar? While we definitely should fix anything we might
have introduced/broken since 8.5.2 if this has been a lingering problem
from before that time we shouldn't hold up the improvements we do have to
chase down every flakey test either.

On the other hand if this looks different than what's on fucit, we need to
investigate.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Marcus Eagan <marcuseagan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Failed again, and on a separate test. I've seen this test fail before. It
> also seems germane to the recent fixes.
>
> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]:
> [junit4] -
> org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger
> [junit4]
> [junit4]
> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.92 .. 2272.95 = 2272.02s
> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.92 .. 2273.58 = 2272.66s
> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.92 .. 2273.05 = 2272.13s
> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.92 .. 2272.92 = 2272.00s
> [junit4] Execution time total: 37 minutes 53 seconds
> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
> 571 ignored (530 assumptions)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
> 571 ignored (530 assumptions) [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]
>
> Total time: 38 minutes 30 seconds
>
> To me, it seems like for the health of the project three or four
> committers should be helping Erickson out with these tests. The flakiness
> is frustrating.
>
> reiterating, on the basis of my test results, -1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Marcus
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wow, it took 7 hours to run the tests on a 4 core machine! I think it is
>> a testament to how broken our tests are. I think re running the tests
>> should so the trick, unless it is another unlucky run.
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Aug, 2020, 3:51 am Marcus Eagan, <marcuseagan@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Houston,
>>>
>>> I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because
>>> of my failure seen here:
>>>
>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
>>> [junit4] -
>>> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest (suite)
>>> [junit4] -
>>> org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
>>> {p0=STREAM}
>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
>>> [junit4]
>>> [junit4]
>>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
>>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
>>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>> [junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
>>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
>>> suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
>>> errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
>>> 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]
>>>
>>> Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds
>>>
>>> Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed
>>> mode)
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
>>>> local 15 node cluster.
>>>>
>>>> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
>>>> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>>>>
>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>>>>
>>>> - Houston
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>>>>
>>>>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection
>>>>> and added a document - success :)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>>>>>>> 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcus Eagan
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Marcus Eagan
>
>

--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

I'm running again and testing that functionality. I'll report back in forty
minutes or 7 hours ????

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 7:23 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:

> That test method has a 1% fail rate on
> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html and shows up
> in BadApple report emails and in fucit.org since a very long time ago (
> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/history-trend-of-recent-failures.html#series/org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger).
> Can you compare the output from your run vs the logs in fucit.org there
> and see if this is similar? While we definitely should fix anything we
> might have introduced/broken since 8.5.2 if this has been a lingering
> problem from before that time we shouldn't hold up the improvements we do
> have to chase down every flakey test either.
>
> On the other hand if this looks different than what's on fucit, we need to
> investigate.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Marcus Eagan <marcuseagan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Failed again, and on a separate test. I've seen this test fail before. It
>> also seems germane to the recent fixes.
>>
>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]:
>> [junit4] -
>> org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger
>> [junit4]
>> [junit4]
>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.92 .. 2272.95 = 2272.02s
>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.92 .. 2273.58 = 2272.66s
>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.92 .. 2273.05 = 2272.13s
>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.92 .. 2272.92 = 2272.00s
>> [junit4] Execution time total: 37 minutes 53 seconds
>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
>> 571 ignored (530 assumptions)
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
>> 571 ignored (530 assumptions) [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]
>>
>> Total time: 38 minutes 30 seconds
>>
>> To me, it seems like for the health of the project three or four
>> committers should be helping Erickson out with these tests. The flakiness
>> is frustrating.
>>
>> reiterating, on the basis of my test results, -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Marcus
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, it took 7 hours to run the tests on a 4 core machine! I think it is
>>> a testament to how broken our tests are. I think re running the tests
>>> should so the trick, unless it is another unlucky run.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Aug, 2020, 3:51 am Marcus Eagan, <marcuseagan@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Houston,
>>>>
>>>> I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because
>>>> of my failure seen here:
>>>>
>>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
>>>> [junit4] -
>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
>>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest
>>>> (suite)
>>>> [junit4] -
>>>> org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
>>>> {p0=STREAM}
>>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
>>>> [junit4]
>>>> [junit4]
>>>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
>>>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
>>>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>>> [junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
>>>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
>>>> suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>>>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
>>>> errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
>>>> 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]
>>>>
>>>> Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds
>>>>
>>>> Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed
>>>> mode)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????
>>>>
>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on a
>>>>> local 15 node cluster.
>>>>>
>>>>> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
>>>>> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection
>>>>>> and added a document - success :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>>>>>>>> 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marcus Eagan
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcus Eagan
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>


--
Marcus Eagan

After multiple failures on the same machine and in the same branch, while
running the exact same command, the build passes:

SUCCESS! [1:42:58.835076]

This time it took almost two hours. Not sure why. I'll leave that to the
team.

The flakiness does scare me. However, the brave among us will be the
messenger. :)

Just in case helps your research:

SUCCESS! [1:42:58.835076]

Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed mode)

I want to also mention, I am now running this test on a couple very beefy
machines. It still failed on them multiple times.

+1 (non-binding) ???????????

Marcus




On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 7:57 PM Marcus Eagan <marcuseagan@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running again and testing that functionality. I'll report back in
> forty minutes or 7 hours ????
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 7:23 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That test method has a 1% fail rate on
>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html and shows up
>> in BadApple report emails and in fucit.org since a very long time ago (
>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/history-trend-of-recent-failures.html#series/org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger).
>> Can you compare the output from your run vs the logs in fucit.org there
>> and see if this is similar? While we definitely should fix anything we
>> might have introduced/broken since 8.5.2 if this has been a lingering
>> problem from before that time we shouldn't hold up the improvements we do
>> have to chase down every flakey test either.
>>
>> On the other hand if this looks different than what's on fucit, we need
>> to investigate.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Marcus Eagan <marcuseagan@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Failed again, and on a separate test. I've seen this test fail before.
>>> It also seems germane to the recent fixes.
>>>
>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]:
>>> [junit4] -
>>> org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.ScheduledTriggerIntegrationTest.testScheduledTrigger
>>> [junit4]
>>> [junit4]
>>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.92 .. 2272.95 = 2272.02s
>>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.92 .. 2273.58 = 2272.66s
>>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.92 .. 2273.05 = 2272.13s
>>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.92 .. 2272.92 = 2272.00s
>>> [junit4] Execution time total: 37 minutes 53 seconds
>>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1
>>> failure, 571 ignored (530 assumptions)
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99_2/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4739 tests, 1 failure,
>>> 571 ignored (530 assumptions) [seed: C26201049D21F7FB]
>>>
>>> Total time: 38 minutes 30 seconds
>>>
>>> To me, it seems like for the health of the project three or four
>>> committers should be helping Erickson out with these tests. The flakiness
>>> is frustrating.
>>>
>>> reiterating, on the basis of my test results, -1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wow, it took 7 hours to run the tests on a 4 core machine! I think it
>>>> is a testament to how broken our tests are. I think re running the tests
>>>> should so the trick, unless it is another unlucky run.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug, 2020, 3:51 am Marcus Eagan, <marcuseagan@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Houston,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm re-running the the test but offering up a -1 (non-binding) because
>>>>> of my failure seen here:
>>>>>
>>>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]:
>>>>> [junit4] -
>>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest.testAPIs
>>>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.DaemonStreamApiTest
>>>>> (suite)
>>>>> [junit4] -
>>>>> org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testPrelimSortingDistribExtraFacet
>>>>> {p0=STREAM}
>>>>> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets (suite)
>>>>> [junit4]
>>>>> [junit4]
>>>>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.97 .. 26436.87 = 26435.90s
>>>>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>>>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.97 .. 26435.31 = 26434.33s
>>>>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.97 .. 26435.06 = 26434.09s
>>>>> [junit4] Execution time total: 7 hours 20 minutes 37 seconds
>>>>> [junit4] Tests summary: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2
>>>>> suite-level errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions)
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/build.xml:231:
>>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/solr/common-build.xml:550:
>>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1599:
>>>>> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>> /private/tmp/smoke_lucene_8.6.1_6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99/unpack/solr-8.6.1/lucene/common-build.xml:1126:
>>>>> There were test failures: 914 suites (5 ignored), 4684 tests, 2 suite-level
>>>>> errors, 1 error, 1 failure, 551 ignored (520 assumptions) [seed:
>>>>> 89F99D88F5DFDCFA]
>>>>>
>>>>> Total time: 441 minutes 21 seconds
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcuss-MBP:lucene-solr marcussorealheis$ java -version
>>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_265"
>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 1.8.0_265-b01)
>>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.265.01.1 (build 25.265-b01, mixed
>>>>> mode)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll kick off another build right now on a faster computer ????
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have also run Ishan's performance test for creating collections on
>>>>>> a local 15 node cluster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The time for creating additional collections is stable, and fixes the
>>>>>> performance degradation introduced in 8.6.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5.57.01 PM.png]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection
>>>>>>> and added a document - success :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <
>>>>>>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Houston.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>>>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>>>>>>>>> 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marcus Eagan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcus Eagan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>
>
> --
> Marcus Eagan
>
>

--
Marcus Eagan

+1 (non binding).

SUCCESS! [1:03:32.13920]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:24 AM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>
> And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and added a document - success :)
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Houston.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00 UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)

--
Regards,

Atri
Apache Concerted

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

SUCCESS! [1:07:08.626970]
Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:49 PM Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (non binding).
>
> SUCCESS! [1:03:32.13920]
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:24 AM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
> >
> > And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection and added a document - success :)
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Houston.
> >>
> >> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
> >>>
> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>
> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00 UTC.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> Here is my +1
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

+1
SUCCESS! [1:30:17.973222]

Regards,
Munendra S N



On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:22 PM Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> SUCCESS! [1:07:08.626970]
> Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:49 PM Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non binding).
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:03:32.13920]
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:24 AM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
> > >
> > > And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection
> and added a document - success :)
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Houston.
> > >>
> > >> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
> > >>>
> > >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
> > >>>
> > >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >>>
> > >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
> 20:00 UTC.
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is my +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Atri
> > Apache Concerted
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

+1 (binding)

Smoke Test: SUCCESS! [0:56:39.184673]

Attempting to run Ishan's benchmark suite comparing 8.6.0 and 8.6.1 I get
the comparable numbers for query times and indexing times.


On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:18 AM Munendra S N <sn.munendra52@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:30:17.973222]
>
> Regards,
> Munendra S N
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:22 PM Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> SUCCESS! [1:07:08.626970]
>> Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:49 PM Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non binding).
>> >
>> > SUCCESS! [1:03:32.13920]
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:24 AM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > SUCCESS! [0:54:03.106188]
>> > >
>> > > And installed the tarball as a 4 node cluster, created a collection
>> and added a document - success :)
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks Houston.
>> > >>
>> > >> SUCCESS! [1:34:35.219332]
>> > >>
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <
>> houstonputman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> > >>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>> > >>>
>> > >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> > >>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13
>> 20:00 UTC.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
>> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Here is my +1
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Atri
>> > Apache Concerted
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Noble Paul
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Thanks for doing this, Houston.

SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]

Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.

+1 (binding)


On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>


--
Anshum Gupta

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:

+1 8 (5 binding)
0 0
-1 0

This vote has PASSED

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Thanks for doing this, Houston.
>
> SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]
>
> Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
> machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Late, but +1

SUCCESS! [1:02:21.504688]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1 8 (5 binding)
> 0 0
> -1 0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing this, Houston.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]
>>
>> Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
>> machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman <houstonputman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>>> UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>