>>> Muhammad Sharfuddin <M.Sharfuddin@nds.com.pk> schrieb am 06.07.2015 um 12:14 in
Nachricht <559A550A.8010906@nds.com.pk>:
[...]
> Ok, so reducing the sbd timeout(or msgwait) would provide the
> uninterrupted access to the ocfs2 file system on the surviving/online node ?
> or would it just minimize the downtime ?
It will reduce the time between "writing the reset message for a node" and "the cluster believes the node is down". So you can guess what happens if you set it to some very short time like 1 second...
Regards,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list is closing down.
Please subscribe to users@clusterlabs.org instead.
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
Nachricht <559A550A.8010906@nds.com.pk>:
[...]
> Ok, so reducing the sbd timeout(or msgwait) would provide the
> uninterrupted access to the ocfs2 file system on the surviving/online node ?
> or would it just minimize the downtime ?
It will reduce the time between "writing the reset message for a node" and "the cluster believes the node is down". So you can guess what happens if you set it to some very short time like 1 second...
Regards,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list is closing down.
Please subscribe to users@clusterlabs.org instead.
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha