Mailing List Archive: Fwd: New resource agents common/core provider name?

Forgot to reply-all.

biker-mice-from-mars +1 ;)
SRATSS - saber rider and the star sheriffs (gotta love the guitar intro)

tachyon - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon
- mainly because any particle that can travel faster than light is
theoretically capable of time travel and this project IS THE FUTURE, excuse
my enthusiasm, I know were talking about RA's but nevertheless
- also http://www.tachyon.org/ <http://www.tachyon.org/> is for sale AFAICS
- it's short...er than clusterlabs
- it's catchy
- I can provide other benefits for the name if it gets a general thumbs up
:)

Anything with ha in its name somewhat limits the scope to high availability,
and this is much more than just that.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > argon +1
>
> that was worth the wait ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> ha-wg-technical mailing list
> ha-wg-technical at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
>

--
Dan Frincu
CCNA, RHCE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/ha-wg-technical/attachments/20110315/4d91b2b4/attachment.htm

Again, the reply-all issue. Please original reply below.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dan Frincu <df.cluster@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ha-wg-technical] New resource agents common/core provider
name?
To: "Fabio M. Di Nitto" <fabbione at fabbione.net>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione at fabbione.net>wrote:

> On 3/18/2011 3:15 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:41:34AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at novell.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> On 2011-03-15T23:37:32, Tim Serong <tserong at novell.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> halabs
> >>>>>> hawg
> >>>>> If pressed I'd probably vote for clusterlabs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Okay, this seems that we're now mostly all in favor of clusterlabs,
> >>>> right? Or at least it's the one we got least push-back against ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> (Just for the record and getting the last word in, I still prefer
> >>>> opencf, but I can live with clusterlabs.)
> >>>
> >>> Either is fine by me.
> >>
> >> I was waiting for inspiration, but somehow it didn't happen.
> >> Anyway, of all suggestions I found planet-ha the best. Though
> >> mice-bikers-from-mars (or how was it?) is definitely a runner-up.
> >
> > "*labs" sounds too much like not-quite-there-yet
> > experimental-level quality stuff.
> >
> > I personally like "core".
> > Yes, that may be boring,
> > but in a positive, HA conservative way boring, so that is good.
> >
> > If it has to be something more "fancy",
> > I'd like it to be linux-ha.
> >
> > And if you insist on being fancy while still trying to avoid the "linux"
> > part of it, planet-ha is my 3rd choice.
> >
>
> let?s go for core then....
>

How about clustercore, it is what is says it is, no labs, no linux, no
hardcore.

Regards,
Dan

>
> Fabio
> _______________________________________________
> ha-wg-technical mailing list
> ha-wg-technical at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
>

--
Dan Frincu
CCNA, RHCE

--
Dan Frincu
CCNA, RHCE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/ha-wg-technical/attachments/20110319/3cd44710/attachment-0001.htm