Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <konstantin.ponomarenko@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
>>> If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated
> Are there any plans to get rid of this option?
> Am I missing something?
The above is talking about crmsh cluster configuration scripts, not core
Pacemaker. As far as I know, no-quorum-policy=ignore is not being
deprecated in Pacemaker.
However, it is no longer the recommended configuration for two node
clusters.
>
> PS: this option is very useful (vital) to me. And "two_node" option won't
> replace it.
>
Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option is
not sufficient?
Cheers,
Kristoffer
--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund@suse.com
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> Hi,
>
>>> If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated
> Are there any plans to get rid of this option?
> Am I missing something?
The above is talking about crmsh cluster configuration scripts, not core
Pacemaker. As far as I know, no-quorum-policy=ignore is not being
deprecated in Pacemaker.
However, it is no longer the recommended configuration for two node
clusters.
>
> PS: this option is very useful (vital) to me. And "two_node" option won't
> replace it.
>
Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option is
not sufficient?
Cheers,
Kristoffer
--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund@suse.com
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/