Mailing List Archive

[PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Add support for SDM630/636/660
Snapdragon 630/660 modem subsystem is similar to one in MSM8998
and can almost reuse it's reset sequence.

Downstream sources call this q6v5 version "qdsp6v62-1-5" and its
code path has additional checks for QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK
status [2].

Inspiration is taken from Konrad Dybcio's work in [1], but reworked
to use common code path with MSM8996/8998, instead of completely
separate "if" block for SDM660.

[1] https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/7dd6dd9b936dc8d6c1f1abe299e5b065c33741e8
[2] https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/blob/lavender-q-oss/drivers/soc/qcom/pil-q6v5.c#L393

Co-developed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@postmarketos.org>

---

In his commit Konrad mentions that modem was unstable, but I don't
observe such behaviour on my device. Modem does not restart by itself,
and I could successfully enable ath10k Wi-Fi with this (and it was
also stable).

Also worth saying that in my initial tests just using qcom,msm8998-mss-pil
as-is, without separate resource struct and separate code paths for
SDM660, was also working fine. So I'm not sure if separate struct and
code path is even needed for sdm660.
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index 8e15e4f85de13..e270fc4798766 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
#define QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x0B0
#define QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x034
#define QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC 0x110
+#define QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS 0x0C4

/* AXI Halt Register Offsets */
#define AXI_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@
#define QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM BIT(22)
#define QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR 0x0038
#define QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL 0x20
+#define QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK BIT(0)

/* QDSP6v65 parameters */
#define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
@@ -130,6 +132,7 @@
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CORE_START 0x400
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CMD 0x404
#define BOOT_FSM_TIMEOUT 10000
+#define BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS 200

struct reg_info {
struct regulator *reg;
@@ -250,6 +253,7 @@ enum {
MSS_MSM8998,
MSS_SC7180,
MSS_SC7280,
+ MSS_SDM660,
MSS_SDM845,
};

@@ -700,7 +704,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
} else if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8909 ||
qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
- qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998) {
+ qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998 ||
+ qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {

if (qproc->version != MSS_MSM8909 &&
qproc->version != MSS_MSM8953)
@@ -734,6 +739,19 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
val |= readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
udelay(1);

+ if (qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
+ for (i = BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS; i > 0; i--) {
+ if (readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS)
+ & QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK)
+ break;
+ udelay(1);
+ }
+ if (!i) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "BHS_EN_REST_ACK not set!\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Put LDO in bypass mode */
val |= QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP;
writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
@@ -756,7 +774,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
i = 19;
} else {
- /* MSS_MSM8998 */
+ /* MSS_MSM8998, MSS_SDM660 */
mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
i = 28;
}
@@ -2193,6 +2211,37 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7280_mss = {
.version = MSS_SC7280,
};

+static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm660_mss = {
+ .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
+ .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "xo",
+ "qdss",
+ "mem",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .active_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "iface",
+ "bus",
+ "gpll0_mss",
+ "mnoc_axi",
+ "snoc_axi",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
+ "cx",
+ "mx",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .need_mem_protection = true,
+ .has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_mba_logs = false,
+ .has_spare_reg = false,
+ .has_qaccept_regs = false,
+ .has_ext_cntl_regs = false,
+ .has_vq6 = false,
+ .version = MSS_SDM660,
+};
+
static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
.hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
.proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
@@ -2475,6 +2524,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id q6v5_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil", .data = &msm8998_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mss-pil", .data = &sc7180_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-mss-pil", .data = &sc7280_mss},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-mss-pil", .data = &sdm660_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mss-pil", .data = &sdm845_mss},
{ },
};
--
2.39.3
Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Add support for SDM630/636/660 [ In reply to ]
On 4.06.2023 08:14, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
> Snapdragon 630/660 modem subsystem is similar to one in MSM8998
> and can almost reuse it's reset sequence.
>
> Downstream sources call this q6v5 version "qdsp6v62-1-5" and its
> code path has additional checks for QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK
> status [2].
>
> Inspiration is taken from Konrad Dybcio's work in [1], but reworked
> to use common code path with MSM8996/8998, instead of completely
> separate "if" block for SDM660.
>
> [1] https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/7dd6dd9b936dc8d6c1f1abe299e5b065c33741e8
> [2] https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/blob/lavender-q-oss/drivers/soc/qcom/pil-q6v5.c#L393
>
> Co-developed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@postmarketos.org>
>
> ---
>
> In his commit Konrad mentions that modem was unstable, but I don't
> observe such behaviour on my device. Modem does not restart by itself,
> and I could successfully enable ath10k Wi-Fi with this (and it was
> also stable).
>
> Also worth saying that in my initial tests just using qcom,msm8998-mss-pil
> as-is, without separate resource struct and separate code paths for
> SDM660, was also working fine. So I'm not sure if separate struct and
> code path is even needed for sdm660.
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 8e15e4f85de13..e270fc4798766 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
> #define QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x0B0
> #define QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x034
> #define QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC 0x110
> +#define QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS 0x0C4
>
> /* AXI Halt Register Offsets */
> #define AXI_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
> @@ -123,6 +124,7 @@
> #define QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM BIT(22)
> #define QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR 0x0038
> #define QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL 0x20
> +#define QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK BIT(0)
>
> /* QDSP6v65 parameters */
> #define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
> @@ -130,6 +132,7 @@
> #define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CORE_START 0x400
> #define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CMD 0x404
> #define BOOT_FSM_TIMEOUT 10000
> +#define BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS 200
>
> struct reg_info {
> struct regulator *reg;
> @@ -250,6 +253,7 @@ enum {
> MSS_MSM8998,
> MSS_SC7180,
> MSS_SC7280,
> + MSS_SDM660,
> MSS_SDM845,
> };
>
> @@ -700,7 +704,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> } else if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8909 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
> - qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998) {
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
>
> if (qproc->version != MSS_MSM8909 &&
> qproc->version != MSS_MSM8953)
> @@ -734,6 +739,19 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> val |= readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
> udelay(1);
>
> + if (qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
> + for (i = BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS; i > 0; i--) {
> + if (readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS)
> + & QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK)
> + break;
> + udelay(1);
> + }
> + if (!i) {
> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "BHS_EN_REST_ACK not set!\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> + }
We could use something like readl_relaxed_poll_timeout instead!

I think it looks good otherwise!

Konrad
> +
> /* Put LDO in bypass mode */
> val |= QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP;
> writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
> @@ -756,7 +774,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
> i = 19;
> } else {
> - /* MSS_MSM8998 */
> + /* MSS_MSM8998, MSS_SDM660 */
> mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
> i = 28;
> }
> @@ -2193,6 +2211,37 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7280_mss = {
> .version = MSS_SC7280,
> };
>
> +static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm660_mss = {
> + .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
> + .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
> + "xo",
> + "qdss",
> + "mem",
> + NULL
> + },
> + .active_clk_names = (char*[]){
> + "iface",
> + "bus",
> + "gpll0_mss",
> + "mnoc_axi",
> + "snoc_axi",
> + NULL
> + },
> + .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
> + "cx",
> + "mx",
> + NULL
> + },
> + .need_mem_protection = true,
> + .has_alt_reset = false,
> + .has_mba_logs = false,
> + .has_spare_reg = false,
> + .has_qaccept_regs = false,
> + .has_ext_cntl_regs = false,
> + .has_vq6 = false,
> + .version = MSS_SDM660,
> +};
> +
> static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
> .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
> .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
> @@ -2475,6 +2524,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id q6v5_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil", .data = &msm8998_mss},
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mss-pil", .data = &sc7180_mss},
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-mss-pil", .data = &sc7280_mss},
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-mss-pil", .data = &sdm660_mss},
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mss-pil", .data = &sdm845_mss},
> { },
> };