Mailing List Archive

This series tries to better sanitize what's actually allowed on which
SoC and lowers the minimum frequency domain count to 1, as that's what's
present on at least QCM2290.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
Konrad Dybcio (8):
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Allow just 1 frequency domain
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Sanitize data per compatible
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add QCM2290
arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw

.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 2 +-
6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 709c6adf19dc558e44ab5c01659b09a16a2d3c82
change-id: 20230308-topic-cpufreq_bindings-5f78e3af96b3

Best regards,
--
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>