Mailing List Archive

[GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

Here are the defconfig changes for 5.15 which contains addition for SAMA7G5.

Thanks, best regards,
Nicolas

The following changes since commit e73f0f0ee7541171d89f2e2491130c7771ba58d3:

Linux 5.14-rc1 (2021-07-11 15:07:40 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-defconfig-5.15

for you to fetch changes up to b62869dcd4bcf341d3750a2bcad9a80c6d5562a8:

ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: add sama7g5 SoC (2021-07-19 15:25:42 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
AT91 defconfig for 5.15:

- add defconfig entries for new SoC: SAMA7G5
- dedicated sama7_defconfig to match the needed peripherals and
dependencies
- addition to the generic multi_v7_defconfig

----------------------------------------------------------------
Eugen Hristev (2):
ARM: configs: at91: add defconfig for sama7 family of SoCs
ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: add sama7g5 SoC

arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +
arch/arm/configs/sama7_defconfig | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 211 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/sama7_defconfig

--
Nicolas Ferre
Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15 [ In reply to ]
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:46 AM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote:
> AT91 defconfig for 5.15:
>
> - add defconfig entries for new SoC: SAMA7G5
> - dedicated sama7_defconfig to match the needed peripherals and
> dependencies

I feel this needs better description in the changelog: Why do you need another
defconfig file in addition to the existing sama5_defconfig? Are they so
different that a single config is not a good fit for both?

Arnd
Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15 [ In reply to ]
On 04/08/2021 at 16:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:46 AM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote:
>> AT91 defconfig for 5.15:
>>
>> - add defconfig entries for new SoC: SAMA7G5
>> - dedicated sama7_defconfig to match the needed peripherals and
>> dependencies
>
> I feel this needs better description in the changelog: Why do you need another
> defconfig file in addition to the existing sama5_defconfig? Are they so
> different that a single config is not a good fit for both?

Hi Arnd,

I'm pushing another tag for this with better description. I hope it's
convincing ;-)

Best regards,
Nicolas

--
Nicolas Ferre