Mailing List Archive

[PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.10.32-rc1

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Move sanitize_val_alu out of op switch

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Improve verifier error messages for users

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Rework ptr_limit into alu_limit and add common error path

Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is set atomically

Fredrik Strupe <fredrik@strupe.net>
ARM: 9071/1: uprobes: Don't hook on thumb instructions

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Move off_reg into sanitize_ptr_alu

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Ensure off_reg has no mixed signed bounds for all types

Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
r8169: don't advertise pause in jumbo mode

Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
r8169: tweak max read request size for newer chips also in jumbo mtu mode

Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
KVM: VMX: Don't use vcpu->run->internal.ndata as an array index

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: VMX: Convert vcpu_vmx.exit_reason to a union

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
bpf: Use correct permission flag for mixed signed bounds arithmetic

Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: beelink-gs1: Remove ext. 32 kHz osc reference

Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
arm64: dts: allwinner: Fix SD card CD GPIO for SOPine systems

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix uninitialized sr_inst

Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
ARM: footbridge: fix PCI interrupt mapping

Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
ARM: 9069/1: NOMMU: Fix conversion for_each_membock() to for_each_mem_range()

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix warning for omap_init_time_of()

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
gro: ensure frag0 meets IP header alignment

Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@chelsio.com>
ch_ktls: do not send snd_una update to TCB in middle

Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@chelsio.com>
ch_ktls: tcb close causes tls connection failure

Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@chelsio.com>
ch_ktls: fix device connection close

Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@chelsio.com>
ch_ktls: Fix kernel panic

Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
ibmvnic: remove duplicate napi_schedule call in open function

Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
ibmvnic: remove duplicate napi_schedule call in do_reset function

Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
ibmvnic: avoid calling napi_disable() twice

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz () physik ! fu-berlin ! de>
ia64: tools: remove inclusion of ia64-specific version of errno.h header

Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
ia64: remove duplicate entries in generic_defconfig

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
ethtool: pause: make sure we init driver stats

Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>
i40e: fix the panic when running bpf in xdpdrv mode

Jonathon Reinhart <jonathon.reinhart@gmail.com>
net: Make tcp_allowed_congestion_control readonly in non-init netns

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
mm: ptdump: fix build failure

Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name>
net: ip6_tunnel: Unregister catch-all devices

Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name>
net: sit: Unregister catch-all devices

Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
net: davicom: Fix regulator not turned off on failed probe

Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>
net/mlx5e: Fix setting of RS FEC mode

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
netfilter: nft_limit: avoid possible divide error in nft_limit_init

wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
net/mlx5e: fix ingress_ifindex check in mlx5e_flower_parse_meta

Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
net: macb: fix the restore of cmp registers

Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
libbpf: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference

Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
netfilter: arp_tables: add pre_exit hook for table unregister

Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
netfilter: bridge: add pre_exit hooks for ebtable unregistration

Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
libnvdimm/region: Fix nvdimm_has_flush() to handle ND_REGION_ASYNC

Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
ice: Fix potential infinite loop when using u8 loop counter

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
netfilter: conntrack: do not print icmpv6 as unknown via /proc

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
netfilter: flowtable: fix NAT IPv6 offload mangling

Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com>
ixgbe: fix unbalanced device enable/disable in suspend/resume

Jolly Shah <jollys@google.com>
scsi: libsas: Reset num_scatter if libata marks qc as NODATA

Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
riscv: Fix spelling mistake "SPARSEMEM" to "SPARSMEM"

Christian A. Ehrhardt <lk@c--e.de>
vfio/pci: Add missing range check in vfio_pci_mmap

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}

Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
arm64: fix inline asm in load_unaligned_zeropad()

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
readdir: make sure to verify directory entry for legacy interfaces too

Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
dm verity fec: fix misaligned RS roots IO

Ping Cheng <pinglinux@gmail.com>
HID: wacom: set EV_KEY and EV_ABS only for non-HID_GENERIC type of devices

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Input: i8042 - fix Pegatron C15B ID entry

Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
Input: s6sy761 - fix coordinate read bit shift

Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
lib: fix kconfig dependency on ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS

A. Cody Schuffelen <schuffelen@google.com>
virt_wifi: Return micros for BSS TSF values

Seevalamuthu Mariappan <seevalam@codeaurora.org>
mac80211: clear sta->fast_rx when STA removed from 4-addr VLAN

Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
net: tipc: Fix spelling errors in net/tipc module

Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>
net/rds: Avoid potential use after free in rds_send_remove_from_sock

Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
pcnet32: Use pci_resource_len to validate PCI resource

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for add llsec seclevel

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: stop dump llsec seclevels for monitors

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for del llsec devkey

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for add llsec devkey

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: stop dump llsec devkeys for monitors

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for del llsec dev

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for add llsec dev

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: stop dump llsec devs for monitors

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for del llsec key

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for add llsec key

Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
net: ieee802154: stop dump llsec keys for monitors

Matt Chen <matt.chen@intel.com>
iwlwifi: add support for Qu with AX201 device

Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state

Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
ASoC: fsl_esai: Fix TDM slot setup for I2S mode

Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
drm/msm: Fix a5xx/a6xx timestamps

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
ARM: omap1: fix building with clang IAS

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
ARM: keystone: fix integer overflow warning

Tong Zhu <zhutong@amazon.com>
neighbour: Disregard DEAD dst in neigh_update

Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
gpu/xen: Fix a use after free in xen_drm_drv_init

Ryan Lee <ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com>
ASoC: max98373: Added 30ms turn on/off time delay

Ryan Lee <ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com>
ASoC: max98373: Changed amp shutdown register as volatile

Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
xfrm: BEET mode doesn't support fragments for inner packets

Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()

Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
ARM: dts: Fix moving mmc devices with aliases for omap4 & 5

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
ARM: dts: Drop duplicate sha2md5_fck to fix clk_disable race

Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: x86: Call acpi_boot_table_init() after acpi_table_upgrade()

Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: fix wq cleanup of WQCFG registers

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
dmaengine: plx_dma: add a missing put_device() on error path

Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
dmaengine: Fix a double free in dma_async_device_register

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
dmaengine: dw: Make it dependent to HAS_IOMEM

Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: fix wq size store permission state

Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: fix opcap sysfs attribute output

Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: fix delta_rec and crc size field for completion record

Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: Fix clobbering of SWERR overflow bit on writeback

Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
gpio: sysfs: Obey valid_mask

Fabian Vogt <fabian@ritter-vogt.de>
Input: nspire-keypad - enable interrupts only when opened

Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix WAITRDY break condition and timeout

Or Cohen <orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com>
net/sctp: fix race condition in sctp_destroy_sock


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +-
arch/arc/kernel/signal.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 5 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi | 8 --
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 5 +
arch/arm/mach-footbridge/cats-pci.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-footbridge/ebsa285-pci.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-footbridge/netwinder-pci.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-footbridge/personal-pci.c | 5 +-
arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap1/ams-delta-fiq-handler.S | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/probes/uprobes/core.c | 4 +-
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 +-
.../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts | 4 +
.../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-sopine.dtsi | 2 +-
.../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-beelink-gs1.dts | 4 -
arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h | 8 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h | 10 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 10 +-
arch/ia64/configs/generic_defconfig | 2 -
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 42 ++++---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 78 ++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 25 +++-
drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 1 +
drivers/dma/dw/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/dma/idxd/device.c | 35 ++++--
drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h | 1 +
drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c | 4 +-
drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c | 19 +--
drivers/dma/plx_dma.c | 18 +--
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 8 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c | 6 +-
drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c | 6 +-
drivers/input/keyboard/nspire-keypad.c | 56 +++++----
drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h | 1 +
drivers/input/touchscreen/s6sy761.c | 4 +-
drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c | 11 +-
drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h | 1 +
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c | 5 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 2 +-
.../chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c | 102 ++-------------
drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 14 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 6 +
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dcb.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 5 +
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/port.c | 23 +---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 3 +
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 18 ++-
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c | 7 +-
drivers/net/wireless/virt_wifi.c | 5 +-
drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 9 +-
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 9 +-
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 2 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 4 +-
fs/readdir.c | 6 +
include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h | 5 +-
include/linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h | 5 +-
include/uapi/linux/idxd.h | 4 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 138 ++++++++++++++-------
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 6 +-
mm/ptdump.c | 2 +-
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c | 8 +-
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_filter.c | 8 +-
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_nat.c | 8 +-
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 30 ++++-
net/core/dev.c | 3 +-
net/core/neighbour.c | 2 +-
net/ethtool/pause.c | 8 +-
net/ieee802154/nl802154.c | 41 ++++++
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 9 +-
net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.c | 10 +-
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 16 ++-
net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 10 ++
net/ipv6/sit.c | 4 +-
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 4 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c | 6 +-
net/netfilter/nft_limit.c | 4 +-
net/rds/message.c | 1 +
net/rds/send.c | 2 +-
net/sctp/socket.c | 13 +-
net/tipc/bearer.h | 6 +-
net/tipc/net.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/node.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 13 ++
sound/soc/codecs/max98373-i2c.c | 1 +
sound/soc/codecs/max98373-sdw.c | 1 +
sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c | 2 +
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 8 +-
tools/include/uapi/asm/errno.h | 2 -
tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 5 +-
103 files changed, 641 insertions(+), 428 deletions(-)
RE: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:05:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

5.10.32-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)

Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
We ran tests on this kernel:

commit 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 (HEAD -> rc/linux-5.10.y)
Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu Apr 15 16:44:09 2021 +0200

Linux 5.10.31-rc1

No problems found.

Hardware tested on:

model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz

Specific tests ran:

ok 1 ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl
ok 2 ltp.py:LTP.test_math
ok 3 ltp.py:LTP.test_dio
ok 4 ltp.py:LTP.test_io
ok 5 ltp.py:LTP.test_power_management_tests
ok 6 ltp.py:LTP.test_can
ok 7 ltp.py:LTP.test_input
ok 8 ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb
ok 9 ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc
ok 10 ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent
ok 11 ltp.py:LTP.test_smoketest
ok 12 ltp.py:LTP.test_containers
ok 13 ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps
ok 14 ltp.py:LTP.test_sched
ok 15 ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading
ok 16 ltp.py:LTP.test_cap_bounds
ok 17 kpatch.sh
ok 18 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help
ok 19 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version
ok 20 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list
ok 21 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record
ok 22 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms
ok 23 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate
ok 24 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist
ok 25 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script
ok 26 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat
ok 27 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench
ok 28 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl
ok 29 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size
ok 30 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync
ok 31 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities
ok 32 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86
ok 33 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd
ok 34 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier
ok 35 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack
ok 36 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs
ok 37 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user
ok 38 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched
ok 39 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens
ok 40 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers

Tested-By: Patrick McCormick <pmccormick@digitalocean.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:27 AM Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:05:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> 5.10.32-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
>
> Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
>
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On 4/19/2021 6:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On 4/19/21 7:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.32-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: bcedd92af6e5899132429d20a9322b12afec2188
* git describe: v5.10.31-104-gbcedd92af6e5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.31-104-gbcedd92af6e5

## No regressions (compared to v5.10.31-56-g86a799ba8d60)

## No fixes (compared to v5.10.31-56-g86a799ba8d60)

## Test result summary
total: 69955, pass: 58611, fail: 1787, skip: 9326, xfail: 231,

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
Hi Greg,

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>


--
Regards
Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On my i686 (gcc 10.3) I found no issues with the new rc

Selftest results [ok/not ok]: [1435/81]

Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov <a.rabusov@tum.de>
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On 2021/4/19 21:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.32-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.32-rc1
Commit: bcedd92af6e5899132429d20a9322b12afec2188
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 5764
passed: 5764
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 5764
passed: 5764
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:16:19PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
> We ran tests on this kernel:
>
> commit 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 (HEAD -> rc/linux-5.10.y)
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Thu Apr 15 16:44:09 2021 +0200
>
> Linux 5.10.31-rc1
>
> No problems found.
>
> Hardware tested on:
>
> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz
>
> Specific tests ran:
>
> ok 1 ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl
> ok 2 ltp.py:LTP.test_math
> ok 3 ltp.py:LTP.test_dio
> ok 4 ltp.py:LTP.test_io
> ok 5 ltp.py:LTP.test_power_management_tests
> ok 6 ltp.py:LTP.test_can
> ok 7 ltp.py:LTP.test_input
> ok 8 ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb
> ok 9 ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc
> ok 10 ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent
> ok 11 ltp.py:LTP.test_smoketest
> ok 12 ltp.py:LTP.test_containers
> ok 13 ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps
> ok 14 ltp.py:LTP.test_sched
> ok 15 ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading
> ok 16 ltp.py:LTP.test_cap_bounds
> ok 17 kpatch.sh
> ok 18 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help
> ok 19 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version
> ok 20 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list
> ok 21 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record
> ok 22 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms
> ok 23 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate
> ok 24 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist
> ok 25 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script
> ok 26 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat
> ok 27 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench
> ok 28 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl
> ok 29 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size
> ok 30 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync
> ok 31 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities
> ok 32 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86
> ok 33 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd
> ok 34 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier
> ok 35 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack
> ok 36 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs
> ok 37 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user
> ok 38 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched
> ok 39 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens
> ok 40 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers
>
> Tested-By: Patrick McCormick <pmccormick@digitalocean.com>

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:07:38PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/19/2021 6:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> --
> Florian

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:30:37PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> CIP testing did not find any problems here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
>
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:15:41AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Build test:
> mips (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 63 configs -> no new failure
> arm (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 105 configs -> no new failure
> x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
>
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
> arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.
>
> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Sudip

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:54:15PM +0200, Andrei Rabusov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On my i686 (gcc 10.3) I found no issues with the new rc
>
> Selftest results [ok/not ok]: [1435/81]
>
> Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov <a.rabusov@tum.de>

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review [ In reply to ]
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:20:59PM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/4/19 21:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.32-rc1,
>
> Kernel repo:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Branch: linux-5.10.y
> Version: 5.10.32-rc1
> Commit: bcedd92af6e5899132429d20a9322b12afec2188
> Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
>
> arm64:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Testcase Result Summary:
> total: 5764
> passed: 5764
> failed: 0
> timeout: 0
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> x86:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Testcase Result Summary:
> total: 5764
> passed: 5764
> failed: 0
> timeout: 0
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
>

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h