Mailing List Archive: Question about key verification with GnuPG 2.2.25

Question about key verification with GnuPG 2.2.25

Dec 6, 2020, 3:12 AM

Post #1 of 3 (204 views)

Hello,
my attempt to verify all keys with GnuPG-2.2.25 shows this response:

$ gpg --refresh-keys
gpg: 59 Schlüssel werden per hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net aktualisiert
gpg: ...
gpg: signature packet: hashed data too long
gpg: read_block: read error: Ungültiges Paket
gpg: Anzahl insgesamt bearbeiteter Schlüssel: 27
gpg: unverändert: 27

In gpg.conf option
charset utf-8
is set only.
GnuPG-2.2.25 has been installed as part of Gpg4win-3.1.14.

How to further explore the shown errors:
gpg: signature packet: hashed data too long
gpg: read_block: read error: Ungültiges Paket

How to identify / correct affected keys?

Thanks and best regards,
Chris

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Question about key verification with GnuPG 2.2.25 [ In reply to ]

gnupg-users at gnupg

Dec 6, 2020, 3:39 AM

Post #2 of 3 (204 views)

Permalink

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:12, gnupgpacker said:

> How to identify / correct affected keys?

As usual add --verose to the gpg invocation. This might give some more
information.

Salam-Shalom,

Werner

--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

RE: Question about key verification with GnuPG 2.2.25 [ In reply to ]

gnupgpacker at on

Dec 6, 2020, 8:41 AM

Post #3 of 3 (203 views)

Permalink

Hello,
the --verbose options gave me some more unusual information:

gpg: Schl?ssel 22EEE0488086...F: Ung?ltige Eigenbeglaubigung f?r User-ID "[jpeg image of size 7915]"
gpg: Schl?ssel 22EEE0488086...F/CE7911B7FC04...F: Ung?ltige Unterschl?ssel-Anbindung
gpg: key 41E7044E1DBA...9: number of dropped non-self-signatures: 60
gpg: Schl?ssel 4E2C6E879329...0/7017ADCEF65C...6: Mehrfache Unterschl?ssel-Anbindung entfernt
gpg: Im Unterpaket des Typs 28 ist das "critical bit" gesetzt
gpg: compacting user ID "<pgpCA@ct.h...e.de>" on key 2BAE3CF6DAFF...0: ung?ltig

Which error causes following warnings:
gpg: signature packet: hashed data too long
gpg: read_block: read error: Ung?ltiges Paket

Thanks once more, best regards, Chris

> As usual add --verose to the gpg invocation. This might give some more
> information.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Mailing List Archive

Mailing List Archive

Attached Files: