On 08.10.19 18:37, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Pity, but I hope it will be better that way. In particular I hope, that Mozilla will not follow your example and won’t entice users to proprietary isolated keyserver [0] instead of distributed SKS network thus splitting the keybase. And won’t promote standards [1] that suspiciously resemble embrace-extend-and-extinguish tactics employed against PGP either.
>
> [0] https://keys.openpgp.org
> [1] https://pep.security
pEp is not against PGP, it's just PGP-supporting as much as it makes
sense for interop reasons and goes beyond email already today; and it's
designed from the very beginning on to support other crypto as well
(agnosticism on messaging & crypto).
--
p?p foundation: https://pep.foundation/
> Pity, but I hope it will be better that way. In particular I hope, that Mozilla will not follow your example and won’t entice users to proprietary isolated keyserver [0] instead of distributed SKS network thus splitting the keybase. And won’t promote standards [1] that suspiciously resemble embrace-extend-and-extinguish tactics employed against PGP either.
>
> [0] https://keys.openpgp.org
> [1] https://pep.security
pEp is not against PGP, it's just PGP-supporting as much as it makes
sense for interop reasons and goes beyond email already today; and it's
designed from the very beginning on to support other crypto as well
(agnosticism on messaging & crypto).
--
p?p foundation: https://pep.foundation/