Mailing List Archive

gnupg configure not searching in /usr/local/ ?
Got a feedback from one user:
He installed all libraries fresh, but still ./configure of gnupg-1.9.15
did complain. It seems that it did not look in /usr/local/
libs though this was default target from make install
in all those packages.

Any hints?
Is this likely to be a bug or a configuration or PATH issue
on the specific platform?
Re: gnupg configure not searching in /usr/local/ ? [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:40:57 +0100, Bernhard Reiter said:

> He installed all libraries fresh, but still ./configure of gnupg-1.9.15
> did complain. It seems that it did not look in /usr/local/
> libs though this was default target from make install

That depends on his toolchain installation as well as the PATH
setting. The default installation target has nothing to do with it;
the default is always /usr/local.



Salam-Shalom,

Werner
Re: gnupg configure not searching in /usr/local/ ? [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 06:00:01PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:40:57 +0100, Bernhard Reiter said:
>
> > He installed all libraries fresh, but still ./configure of gnupg-1.9.15
> > did complain. It seems that it did not look in /usr/local/
> > libs though this was default target from make install
>
> That depends on his toolchain installation as well as the PATH
> setting. The default installation target has nothing to do with it;
> the default is always /usr/local.

If this is the standard installation target, wouldn't it make sense
to have it searched for libraries in a standard ./configure run?
Re: gnupg configure not searching in /usr/local/ ? [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:14:32 +0100, Bernhard Reiter said:

> If this is the standard installation target, wouldn't it make sense
> to have it searched for libraries in a standard ./configure run?

No. Because it would be a surprise if one package suddenly starts to
behave differently. If you still think this is a good idea, try to
convince the automake folks.

Werner