Mailing List Archive

New gnupg 1.9 release
Hi!

I have just released GnuPG 1.9.9 with some minor fixes. Note that
this is the S/MIME enhanced version of GnuPG which should peacefully
coexists with other GnupG versions (1.2.x or 1.3.x). See the README
and NEWS file for details.

ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.9.9.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.9.9.tar.gz.sig
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.9.8-1.9.9.diff.gz

You also need to update two of the libraries:

ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libksba/libksba-0.9.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libksba/libksba-0.9.7.tar.gz.sig
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libksba/libksba-0.9.6-0.9.7.diff.gz

ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libassuan/libassuan-0.6.6.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libassuan/libassuan-0.6.6.tar.gz.sig
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/libassuan/libassuan-0.6.5-0.6.6.tar.gz


Noteworthy changes are:

* [gpg-agent] The new option --allow-mark-trusted is now required to
allow gpg-agent to add a key to the trustlist.txt after user
confirmation.

* Creating PKCS#10 requests does now honor the key usage.


Happy hacking,

Werner


--
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
The GnuPG Experts http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe http://fsfeurope.org
Re: New gnupg 1.9 release [ In reply to ]
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 21:42, Werner Koch wrote:

> Noteworthy changes are:
>
> * [gpg-agent] The new option --allow-mark-trusted is now required to
> allow gpg-agent to add a key to the trustlist.txt after user
> confirmation.
>
> * Creating PKCS#10 requests does now honor the key usage.

Does this release have the getline calls removed or backed up by a replacement
(see http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gpa-dev/2004-April/001892.html)?

We still have to ship 1.9.3 in FreeBSD ports because of this.

--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Re: New gnupg 1.9 release [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:58:41 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:

> Does this release have the getline calls removed or backed up by a replacement
Sorry no. I'll take care of this now.

Thanks,

Werner