New submission from Marc Mutz <marc@klaralvdalens-datakonsult.se>:
Another topic that I think is strange is that ownertrust and validity share a
common enum gpgme_validity_t. It should have a gpgme_(owner)trust_t for the
ownertrust values instead, as these are two different things, and the compiler
should be able to detect when you try to use one for the other (C doesn't do
this, but C++ will).
----------
assignedto: marcus
messages: 1061
nosy: marc, marcus
priority: wish
status: unread
title: gpgme: should have different types for the validity and ownertrust enums
topic: GPGME
______________________________________________________
Aegypten issue tracker <aegypten-issues@intevation.de>
<https://intevation.de/roundup/aegypten/issue215>
______________________________________________________
Another topic that I think is strange is that ownertrust and validity share a
common enum gpgme_validity_t. It should have a gpgme_(owner)trust_t for the
ownertrust values instead, as these are two different things, and the compiler
should be able to detect when you try to use one for the other (C doesn't do
this, but C++ will).
----------
assignedto: marcus
messages: 1061
nosy: marc, marcus
priority: wish
status: unread
title: gpgme: should have different types for the validity and ownertrust enums
topic: GPGME
______________________________________________________
Aegypten issue tracker <aegypten-issues@intevation.de>
<https://intevation.de/roundup/aegypten/issue215>
______________________________________________________