Mailing List Archive: Support for RFC 4357

Support for RFC 4357

Mar 5, 2020, 2:49 AM

Post #1 of 4 (730 views)

Hello,

On February 9th I've sent three patches implementing support for a
part of RFC 4357 (key meshing for GOST 28147-89) [1]. This is required
to support CMS and encrypted private key files using GOST 28147-89
algorithm (see RFC 4490).

For a month there was no reaction on the ML. I'm trying to understand
now, if there are any issues with the patches themselves, with the
approach selected to implement it, or we should just wait for some
time?

[1] https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2020-February/004922.html

--
With best wishes
Dmitry

_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel

Re: Support for RFC 4357 [ In reply to ]

gcrypt-devel at gnupg

Mar 18, 2020, 3:03 AM

Post #2 of 4 (724 views)

Permalink

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:49, Dmitry Baryshkov said:

> For a month there was no reaction on the ML. I'm trying to understand

Sorry, for this. I guess we all waited for someone to start commenting
on it. I now had a brief look at it and noticed that the changes only
affect the GOST algorithms and add one new algo identifier.

From my point of view the pacthes are okay and can be applied. @jussi,
@gniibe, okay?

Shalom-Salam,

Werner

--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

Re: Support for RFC 4357 [ In reply to ]

gniibe at fsij

Mar 18, 2020, 5:15 PM

Post #3 of 4 (723 views)

Permalink

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:
> From my point of view the pacthes are okay and can be applied. @jussi,
> @gniibe, okay?

No problem. My apologize for not reviewing soonish. I was busy for
other work (constant-time modular multiplicative inverse).
--

_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel

Re: Support for RFC 4357 [ In reply to ]

jussi.kivilinna at iki

Mar 19, 2020, 2:56 AM

Post #4 of 4 (723 views)

Permalink

On 18.3.2020 12.03, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:49, Dmitry Baryshkov said:
>
>> For a month there was no reaction on the ML. I'm trying to understand
>
> Sorry, for this. I guess we all waited for someone to start commenting
> on it. I now had a brief look at it and noticed that the changes only
> affect the GOST algorithms and add one new algo identifier.
>
> From my point of view the pacthes are okay and can be applied. @jussi,
> @gniibe, okay?
>

Looks ok to me.

-Jussi

_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel

Mailing List Archive

Mailing List Archive

Attached Files: