Mailing List Archive

Re: [PATCH] configure.ac: do not hardcode gnu libc when generating lock-obj
Hello,

Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de> wrote:
> This erroneously excluded e.g. musl libc.

Sorry, I don't think so. Let me explain my viewpoint.

When writing this part, my intention was to identify GNU/Linux system.
(*-*-linux-gnu* is used to identify: GNU Operating System, which uses
Linux kernel.)

From viewpoint of using GNU tools, it is unfortunate for systems having
different semantics for GNU triplet.


Well, anyhow, that's the reality, I know.

Could you please describe names of system which supports same ABI as GNU
system?

Then, let us add those (not changing existing case).
--

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
Re: [PATCH] configure.ac: do not hardcode gnu libc when generating lock-obj [ In reply to ]
"Alexander Kanavin" <alex@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The case which we (the Yocto project) would like to support is building for systems
> with Linux kernel and musl C library.

Thank you.

Applied in: e17cf023d894acc3932505f66fbd9c31ce56793f
--

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel