-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Interesting study. I like the premise of it. However, I'm not sure I
agree with their method. From the article:
"For instance, if a distribution fixed an issue on the earliest date, it
would receive a score of 100 for that issue; if it was the last vendor to
fix the issue, it would get a score of 0. One can then average the scores
after evaluating the 30 issues."
So this is just a ranking, with no quantitative results. What I'd really
like to know are the distributions' average response times for the High
and Moderate vulnerabilities.
While Gentoo might be 6th, I'd like to know how much slower Gentoo gets
out patches than Ubuntu, Fedora, and/or RHEL.
- -Vince
- --
Vincent Rivellino
GPG Key ID: 62BFEBE4
https://cuz.cx/gpg
On Mon, August 7, 2006 07:42, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just stumbled over an article from SearchSecurity.com which was linked
> to in a heise newsticker posting that tries to analyze how fast
> distributions react to security vulnerabilities:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/lplfb
>
>
> Quick chart:
>
>
> Rank Distro Points/100
> ---- ------------------------- ----------
> 1. Ubuntu 76
> 2. Fedora Core 70
> 3. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 63
> 4. Debian GNU/Linux 61
> 5. Mandriva Linux 54
> 6. Gentoo Linux 39
> 7. Trustix Secure Linux 32
> 8. SUSE Linux Enterprise 32
> 9. Slackware Linux 30
>
>
> Rank 6 out of 10 is not a great result -- at least we beat SUSE ;)
>
>
> Any comments or thoughts about this?
> Can we become better?
> Are we maybe better than the author pretends?
> Does the security team currently face serious problems that need to be
> solved, be it inside or outside the security team?
>
> I am just curious and would be glad to get some feedback :)
> --
> Regards,
> Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
> --
> gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE12eKhUAfdmK/6+QRAm4sAJ9U4hDbql8b5Du7ELWTclnBdwXONACghkRk
PLfad2L0hjQZ99puzngf4nU=
=/aSm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
Hash: SHA1
Interesting study. I like the premise of it. However, I'm not sure I
agree with their method. From the article:
"For instance, if a distribution fixed an issue on the earliest date, it
would receive a score of 100 for that issue; if it was the last vendor to
fix the issue, it would get a score of 0. One can then average the scores
after evaluating the 30 issues."
So this is just a ranking, with no quantitative results. What I'd really
like to know are the distributions' average response times for the High
and Moderate vulnerabilities.
While Gentoo might be 6th, I'd like to know how much slower Gentoo gets
out patches than Ubuntu, Fedora, and/or RHEL.
- -Vince
- --
Vincent Rivellino
GPG Key ID: 62BFEBE4
https://cuz.cx/gpg
On Mon, August 7, 2006 07:42, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just stumbled over an article from SearchSecurity.com which was linked
> to in a heise newsticker posting that tries to analyze how fast
> distributions react to security vulnerabilities:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/lplfb
>
>
> Quick chart:
>
>
> Rank Distro Points/100
> ---- ------------------------- ----------
> 1. Ubuntu 76
> 2. Fedora Core 70
> 3. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 63
> 4. Debian GNU/Linux 61
> 5. Mandriva Linux 54
> 6. Gentoo Linux 39
> 7. Trustix Secure Linux 32
> 8. SUSE Linux Enterprise 32
> 9. Slackware Linux 30
>
>
> Rank 6 out of 10 is not a great result -- at least we beat SUSE ;)
>
>
> Any comments or thoughts about this?
> Can we become better?
> Are we maybe better than the author pretends?
> Does the security team currently face serious problems that need to be
> solved, be it inside or outside the security team?
>
> I am just curious and would be glad to get some feedback :)
> --
> Regards,
> Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
> --
> gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE12eKhUAfdmK/6+QRAm4sAJ9U4hDbql8b5Du7ELWTclnBdwXONACghkRk
PLfad2L0hjQZ99puzngf4nU=
=/aSm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list