Best regards,
Brian
>From: William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
>Reply-To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
>To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053
>fixedin -r3? (black icons)
>Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:28:56 +0800
>
>I'm using the workaround of manually deleting the problem patch during
>the build.
>
>The problem for gentoo that I see is that with the removal of -r1 (and
>xfree being the only viable alternative is not available either), gentoo
>does not have a usable desktop for those actually using it in
>production, so this should be viewed as a serious issue that requires
>active resolution - just leaving this issue in place until we catch up
>with upstream means this is going to become a running sore for gentoo.
>
>We (the users) need a stable, secure, and working X.
>
>BillK
>
>
>
>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:03 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:59:21AM +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > > Re the xorg-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? The -r2
> > > version is unusable for me because of this.
> > >
> > > According to the bug its resolved, fixed upstream, but there is no
> > > detail which versions of xorg it applies to.
> > >
> > > BillK
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > -r3 is just a simple security bump from -r2, so it should have all the
> > characteristics of -r2 except for that buffer overflow issue with pixmap
> > memory requests. So yeah, you'll still see black icons, but please do
> > track the upstream bug:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Seemant
>--
>William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
>Home!
>--
>gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
Brian
>From: William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
>Reply-To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
>To: gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053
>fixedin -r3? (black icons)
>Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:28:56 +0800
>
>I'm using the workaround of manually deleting the problem patch during
>the build.
>
>The problem for gentoo that I see is that with the removal of -r1 (and
>xfree being the only viable alternative is not available either), gentoo
>does not have a usable desktop for those actually using it in
>production, so this should be viewed as a serious issue that requires
>active resolution - just leaving this issue in place until we catch up
>with upstream means this is going to become a running sore for gentoo.
>
>We (the users) need a stable, secure, and working X.
>
>BillK
>
>
>
>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:03 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:59:21AM +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > > Re the xorg-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? The -r2
> > > version is unusable for me because of this.
> > >
> > > According to the bug its resolved, fixed upstream, but there is no
> > > detail which versions of xorg it applies to.
> > >
> > > BillK
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > -r3 is just a simple security bump from -r2, so it should have all the
> > characteristics of -r2 except for that buffer overflow issue with pixmap
> > memory requests. So yeah, you'll still see black icons, but please do
> > track the upstream bug:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Seemant
>--
>William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
>Home!
>--
>gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
gentoo-security@gentoo.org mailing list