This http://www.gentoo.org/news/20041021-portage51.xml tells us all about the gpg signing working it's way into portage.
It tells us what to add to make.conf to have the sigs checked.
Doing so gives the error
PORTAGE_GPG_DIR is invalid. Removing gpg from FEATURES.
Two questions.
1) What do I, as a user have to do now to start testing/playing with gpg signed manifests?
2) Why were partial, incompleate instructions put in the newsletter?
There seem to be a lot of signed manifests now, a grep of the portage tree gave me a 60K file with just the package names. Seems like a good time to start using them.
It tells us what to add to make.conf to have the sigs checked.
Doing so gives the error
PORTAGE_GPG_DIR is invalid. Removing gpg from FEATURES.
Two questions.
1) What do I, as a user have to do now to start testing/playing with gpg signed manifests?
2) Why were partial, incompleate instructions put in the newsletter?
There seem to be a lot of signed manifests now, a grep of the portage tree gave me a 60K file with just the package names. Seems like a good time to start using them.