Mailing List Archive: GLEPs soon to expire

GLEPs soon to expire

Oct 20, 2004, 1:55 PM

Post #1 of 5 (563 views)

Dear all,
On 1 November I'm finally going to enforce GLEP 28, which "expires"
all Draft GLEPs that have been inactive for more than 60 days and all
Accepted GLEPs that have been inactive for more than six months. To
prevent your favorite GLEP from being marked "deferred", please send the
GLEP editors (at glep@gentoo.org) a status update or a request that the
GLEP either be submitted for approval or marked final (if already
approved).

GLEPs that need attention:

5 Metadata.xml extension
11 Web Application Installation (I assume this should be final, now)
13 Providing the users with a Gentoo Handbook (Final?)
14 Security updates based on GLSA (Current status?)
15 Gentoo Script Repository (Current status?)
16 Gentoo Menu System
17 Resolution for Aging Ebuilds
18 Gentoo Bimonthly Publication
19 Gentoo Stable Portage Tree (Was this ever approved?)
20 /srv - Services Home Directory Support (Didn't we approve this one?)
21 User-defined package sets
23 Portage handling of ACCEPT_LICENSE (Did we approve this one?)
24 Consistent Gentoo tool naming scheme
25 Distfile Patching Support
26 Handling kernels with portage

Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Re: GLEPs soon to expire [ In reply to ]

carlo at gentoo

Oct 20, 2004, 2:19 PM

Post #2 of 5 (547 views)

Permalink

On Wednesday 20 October 2004 22:55, Grant Goodyear wrote:

Am I the only one missing GLEP 28 in that list? ("Status: Draft" or
"approved"?) (:)

What defines "inactivity"? Regarding GLEP 15, there were a ml discussion the
last days.

Carsten

Re: GLEPs soon to expire [ In reply to ]

jstubbs at gentoo

Oct 21, 2004, 7:45 AM

Post #3 of 5 (548 views)

Permalink

On Thursday 21 October 2004 05:55, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> 23 Portage handling of ACCEPT_LICENSE (Did we approve this one?)

The LICENSE syntax was approved and repoman has been updated to check for it.
The grouping is the other main issue which is shared almost entirely with
GLEP 28. There seems to be little interest feedback-wise in either GLEP's
case and no negative feedback to the main purpose... Once the few issues and
opinions are addressed and integrated, (I hope) we should be able to
fasttrack them pretty easily.

Regards,
Jason Stubbs

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: GLEPs soon to expire [ In reply to ]

g2boojum at gentoo

Oct 22, 2004, 8:37 AM

Post #4 of 5 (548 views)

Permalink

> Am I the only one missing GLEP 28 in that list? ("Status: Draft" or
> "approved"?) (:)

*Grin* I wrote the e-mail before the servers had synced the change to
the status of GLEP 28 to "Informational". I actually did try to follow
our own rules.

> What defines "inactivity"? Regarding GLEP 15, there were a ml discussion the
> last days.

From GLEP 28: "Inactivity is defined simply as the GLEP author has not
contacted the GLEP editors with either an update or a request to submit
the GLEP for approval (in the case of a Draft GLEP) or a request that
the GLEP be marked final (in the case of an Accepted GLEP)."

An update need not be more than a single line similar to "20041022 -
Currently working on foo". That way our users can learn the status of a
GLEP simply by looking at the GLEP.

-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Re: GLEPs soon to expire [ In reply to ]

hadfield at gentoo

Oct 24, 2004, 7:05 PM

Post #5 of 5 (549 views)

Permalink

Grant Goodyear wrote:

>15 Gentoo Script Repository (Current status?)
>
Hey Grant,
Ian (port001) and I are still working on the script repository. There's
not much to report on right now, but it's almost functionally complete
and I'm hoping to have the first alpha release of it ready for use by
the end of november or so.

Cheers,
Scott

Mailing List Archive

Mailing List Archive

Attached Files: