https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2705
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@wizmail.org> ---
Yes, there's a disparate codepath for the filter-test; it goes back to at least
2004 - and message_body_newlines was only added in 2007 (ddea74fabb).
Ref: filtertest.c 126 - stores data having unconditionally replaced newline
with space.
I expect the filter in actual use rather than being tested will behave
differently,
so it's a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@wizmail.org> ---
Yes, there's a disparate codepath for the filter-test; it goes back to at least
2004 - and message_body_newlines was only added in 2007 (ddea74fabb).
Ref: filtertest.c 126 - stores data having unconditionally replaced newline
with space.
I expect the filter in actual use rather than being tested will behave
differently,
so it's a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##