Mailing List Archive: NAT on ASR920 Everest

NAT on ASR920 Everest

Oct 21, 2020, 12:11 PM

Post #1 of 3 (540 views)

Hello all, I'm trying to configure NAT on an ASR920
running 16.06.05a [Everest]
GW-01#show license
Index 1 Feature: advancedmetroipaccess
Period left: Life time
License Type: Permanent
License State: Active, In Use
License Count: Non-Counted
License Priority: Medium

Docs say it should be configurable.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-16-6/nat-xe-16-6-book.pdf

However, none of the standard NAT commands are available.
Example:ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
overload (access-list is already configured)

"nat" is not a subcommand of "ip" and I get an error:
GW-01(config)#ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
overload
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

GW-01(config)#

Even under the interface, the ip nat inside or ip nat outside is not a
valid command.

LTE-NAT-HOC-GW-01(config)#ip ?
Global IP configuration subcommands:
...
...
multicast Global IP Multicast Commands
multicast-routing Enable IP multicast forwarding
name-server Specify address of name server to use
nbar NBAR - Network Based Application Recognition
options IP Options treatment
...
...

Anyone know if maybe it's a license level and I need to drop
to metroipaccess or lower? Or is EVEREST not correctly supported?

Reaching out in case anyone has run into this before.

Thanks,
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: NAT on ASR920 Everest [ In reply to ]

shawn at rmrf

Oct 21, 2020, 12:24 PM

Post #2 of 3 (540 views)

Permalink

I remember reading somewhere that NAT wsan't supported on the 920 series.
Though I did find this

It appears that NAT is only supported on the 12SZ-IM

https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/nat-on-cisco-asr920/td-p/3023788

With that being said, I haven't tried it on any of the ASR920s that we've
purchased

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:13 PM Scott Miller <fordlove@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all, I'm trying to configure NAT on an ASR920
> running 16.06.05a [Everest]
> GW-01#show license
> Index 1 Feature: advancedmetroipaccess
> Period left: Life time
> License Type: Permanent
> License State: Active, In Use
> License Count: Non-Counted
> License Priority: Medium
>
> Docs say it should be configurable.
>
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-16-6/nat-xe-16-6-book.pdf
>
> However, none of the standard NAT commands are available.
> Example:ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
> overload (access-list is already configured)
>
> "nat" is not a subcommand of "ip" and I get an error:
> GW-01(config)#ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
> overload
> ^
> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
>
> GW-01(config)#
>
> Even under the interface, the ip nat inside or ip nat outside is not a
> valid command.
>
> LTE-NAT-HOC-GW-01(config)#ip ?
> Global IP configuration subcommands:
> ...
> ...
> multicast Global IP Multicast Commands
> multicast-routing Enable IP multicast forwarding
> name-server Specify address of name server to use
> nbar NBAR - Network Based Application Recognition
> options IP Options treatment
> ...
> ...
>
> Anyone know if maybe it's a license level and I need to drop
> to metroipaccess or lower? Or is EVEREST not correctly supported?
>
> Reaching out in case anyone has run into this before.
>
> Thanks,
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: NAT on ASR920 Everest [ In reply to ]

fordlove at gmail

Oct 21, 2020, 12:32 PM

Post #3 of 3 (540 views)

Permalink

Ouch ... I have a number of ASR-920-12CZ-A ... and was trying to re-utilize
my existing inventory.

Back to the storage room we go.

Thanks.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:24 PM Shawn L <shawn@rmrf.us> wrote:

> I remember reading somewhere that NAT wsan't supported on the 920 series.
> Though I did find this
>
>
> It appears that NAT is only supported on the 12SZ-IM
>
> https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/nat-on-cisco-asr920/td-p/3023788
>
> With that being said, I haven't tried it on any of the ASR920s that we've
> purchased
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:13 PM Scott Miller <fordlove@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all, I'm trying to configure NAT on an ASR920
>> running 16.06.05a [Everest]
>> GW-01#show license
>> Index 1 Feature: advancedmetroipaccess
>> Period left: Life time
>> License Type: Permanent
>> License State: Active, In Use
>> License Count: Non-Counted
>> License Priority: Medium
>>
>> Docs say it should be configurable.
>>
>>
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-16-6/nat-xe-16-6-book.pdf
>>
>> However, none of the standard NAT commands are available.
>> Example:ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
>> overload (access-list is already configured)
>>
>> "nat" is not a subcommand of "ip" and I get an error:
>> GW-01(config)#ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
>> overload
>> ^
>> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
>>
>> GW-01(config)#
>>
>> Even under the interface, the ip nat inside or ip nat outside is not a
>> valid command.
>>
>> LTE-NAT-HOC-GW-01(config)#ip ?
>> Global IP configuration subcommands:
>> ...
>> ...
>> multicast Global IP Multicast Commands
>> multicast-routing Enable IP multicast forwarding
>> name-server Specify address of name server to use
>> nbar NBAR - Network Based Application Recognition
>> options IP Options treatment
>> ...
>> ...
>>
>> Anyone know if maybe it's a license level and I need to drop
>> to metroipaccess or lower? Or is EVEREST not correctly supported?
>>
>> Reaching out in case anyone has run into this before.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/