Mailing List Archive

Why fastcgi using load balancers (ip hash, round robin, failover)?
What scenarios should I use it as load balancer?


regards!



--
View this message in context: http://cherokee-web-server-general.1049476.n5.nabble.com/Why-fastcgi-using-load-balancers-ip-hash-round-robin-failover-tp5706814.html
Sent from the Cherokee Web Server - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee@lists.octality.com
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
Re: Why fastcgi using load balancers (ip hash, round robin, failover)? [ In reply to ]
When you need more than one worker process.

So almost always in 'serious' apps, and never in 'small blogs' probably.

Pozdrawiam
Jędrzej Nowak


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM, meijiwolf <meijiwolf@hotmail.com> wrote:

> What scenarios should I use it as load balancer?
>
>
> regards!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cherokee-web-server-general.1049476.n5.nabble.com/Why-fastcgi-using-load-balancers-ip-hash-round-robin-failover-tp5706814.html
> Sent from the Cherokee Web Server - General mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> Cherokee@lists.octality.com
> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
>
Re: Why fastcgi using load balancers (ip hash, round robin, failover)? [ In reply to ]
ok, but  fastcgi can balance loads on different virtual servers as HTTP
reverse proxy?

thank you!



--
View this message in context: http://cherokee-web-server-general.1049476.n5.nabble.com/Why-fastcgi-using-load-balancers-ip-hash-round-robin-failover-tp5706814p5706816.html
Sent from the Cherokee Web Server - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee@lists.octality.com
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee