Hello
I am ready to commit MS-WDV support for mod_dav. There are many other
MS extensions, and I just wonder if we should prepare to configure MS
extensions one by one or as a whole
I mean, what directive makes more sense in httpd.conf?
DAVMSext on (and if we add new MS extensions, this enables all of them)
DAVMSWDV on (and if we implement MS-FOO, we will add DAVMSFOO directive)
DAVMSext WDV (if we implemnt MS-FOO, it could become DAVMSext WDV FOO)
We can also use the first cas, and turn it into the third case later,
with "on" being a shortcut for all implemented MS extensions.
Thoughts?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@netbsd.org
I am ready to commit MS-WDV support for mod_dav. There are many other
MS extensions, and I just wonder if we should prepare to configure MS
extensions one by one or as a whole
I mean, what directive makes more sense in httpd.conf?
DAVMSext on (and if we add new MS extensions, this enables all of them)
DAVMSWDV on (and if we implement MS-FOO, we will add DAVMSFOO directive)
DAVMSext WDV (if we implemnt MS-FOO, it could become DAVMSext WDV FOO)
We can also use the first cas, and turn it into the third case later,
with "on" being a shortcut for all implemented MS extensions.
Thoughts?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@netbsd.org