Mailing List Archive

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, stefan@eissing.org wrote:

> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/

Nitpick: This has probably been this way in all previous releases, but
just discovered it when browsing around: The Announcement2.4.* files
says "September 21, 2018" which is odd since it also says Apache HTTP
Server 2.4.50 Released. I suspect the 2018 date is from the first 2.4
release, and has been carried forward since?

So, nothing stopping this release, but should probably go in the
to-fix-list for future relases..

Even less important nitpick: there's a header.html saying these are
pre-release versions, would be nice with a matching server config for
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ that also displayed it
:) The .htaccess is browsable (it probably shouldn't be) and seems to
try to achieve this, but obviously isn't used.

/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | nikke@acc.umu.se
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 04:40:44PM +0200, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz

+1 for release, thanks for RMing again.

All tests pass on RHEL8. I got a heartbeat.t failure in Fedora 34 which
I haven't looked at but assume it's a test problem since it's a new
test. Otherwise everything passed.

Regards, Joe

On 10/1/21 11:12, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
>
>> Hi, all;
>>   Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> Nitpick: This has probably been this way in all previous releases, but
> just discovered it when browsing around: The Announcement2.4.* files
> says "September 21, 2018" which is odd since


That is just a template.



--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

On 10/1/21 16:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>
+1 for release, thanks for RMing.

All works fine on OpenBSD-6.9, OpenBSD-7.0 and CentOS8.
Giovanni

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:40 PM stefan@eissing.org <stefan@eissing.org> wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:

[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!

All my testing passed on my debian(s) 11 and 10.
Signatures and digests OK.

Thanks Stefan for the lightning fast RM process!

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:41 AM stefan@eissing.org <stefan@eissing.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.

Thanks Stefan!

+1 aix/xlc/pc64

+1: It's not just good, it's good enough!

Looks good for us, Cent6/7/8 Alma8

Thanks for RM?n.

Cory McIntire
PO ? cPanel Security Team
Release Manager ? EasyApache
cPanel / WebPros


From: stefan@eissing.org <stefan@eissing.org>
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 9:41 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/

I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.

The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz

The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.

Kind Regards,
Stefan

On 10/1/21 10:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>

On ye Solaris 10 SPARC64 boxen again where everything seems to compile
just fine but with OpenSSL 3.0.0 the answer is "nope" :

beta # /opt/bw/bin/httpd -V
Server version: Apache/2.4.50 (Unix)
Server built: Oct 1 2021 18:30:31
Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:117
Server loaded: APR 1.7.0, APR-UTIL 1.6.1
Compiled using: APR 1.7.0, APR-UTIL 1.6.1
Architecture: 64-bit
Server MPM: event
threaded: yes (fixed thread count)
forked: yes (variable process count)
Server compiled with....
-D APR_HAS_SENDFILE
-D APR_HAS_MMAP
-D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled)
-D APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
-D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
-D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT
-D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD
-D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS
-D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=256
-D HTTPD_ROOT="/opt/bw"
-D SUEXEC_BIN="/opt/bw/bin/suexec"
-D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="var/apache/httpd/logs/httpd.pid"
-D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status"
-D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log"
-D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/httpd/mime.types"
-D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf"
beta #

beta # /opt/bw/bin/apachectl start
httpd: Syntax error on line 99 of /opt/bw/etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf:
Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal:
relocation error: file /opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC:
referenced symbol not found
beta #

Not a big surprise.

I shift over to a machine with the OpenSSL 1.1.1 goodness.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

On 02/10/2021 01:12, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
>
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> Nitpick: This has probably been this way in all previous releases, but
> just discovered it when browsing around: The Announcement2.4.* files
> says "September 21, 2018" which is odd since it also says Apache HTTP
> Server 2.4.50 Released. I suspect the 2018 date is from the first 2.4
> release, and has been carried forward since?

It's a template placeholder, it gets copied and changed upon running of
formal release processes

(No, 2.4.0 was released around the start of 2012)

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.

On 10/1/21 10:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>

+1: It's not just good, it's good with OpenSSL 1.1.1

On ye SPARC64 Solaris 10 server here it seems to work just fine with
OpenSSL 1.1.1l and of course it does not work ( yet ) with OpenSSL 3.0.0
and we already know that :

beta # /opt/bw/bin/apachectl start
httpd: Syntax error on line 99 of /opt/bw/etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf:
Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal:
relocation error: file /opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC:
referenced symbol not found
beta #

I don't know if trunk is functional and I have not really jumped on
trunk in a few weeks and I'll give that a whirl but autoconf/autoreconf
autotools madness was giving me hardship. At least last time I looked
which was 1893292 about two weeks ago.

Anyways 2.4.50 seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l for me.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Thanks for testing Dennis. We need to get this release out quick due to
regressions, so it wasn't the right moment to apply the OpenSSL patch.

I'm confident, that Joe's OpenSSL 3.0.0 patch will be included in the
next regular 2.4 release.

Best regards,

Rainer

Am 02.10.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
> On 10/1/21 10:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>
> +1: It's not just good, it's good with OpenSSL 1.1.1
>
> On ye SPARC64 Solaris 10 server here it seems to work just fine with
> OpenSSL 1.1.1l and of course it does not work ( yet ) with OpenSSL 3.0.0
> and we already know that :
>
> beta # /opt/bw/bin/apachectl start
> httpd: Syntax error on line 99 of /opt/bw/etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal:
> relocation error: file /opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC:
> referenced symbol not found
> beta #
>
> I don't know if trunk is functional and I have not really jumped on
> trunk in a few weeks and I'll give that a whirl but autoconf/autoreconf
> autotools madness was giving me hardship. At least last time I looked
> which was 1893292 about two weeks ago.
>
> Anyways 2.4.50 seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l for me.

On 10/2/21 14:07, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Thanks for testing Dennis. We need to get this release out quick due to
> regressions, so it wasn't the right moment to apply the OpenSSL patch.
>
> I'm confident, that Joe's OpenSSL 3.0.0 patch will be included in the
> next regular 2.4 release.
>

Not a problem at all. I am glad to keep that big Fujitsu/Oracle/Sun
gear running and doing something useful. Given that it is under a nearly
eternal support contract there is good chance that I will be testing
things in that harsh POSIX compliant UNIX world for quite a while.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

On 02/10/2021 00:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:

> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256:
> feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a
> *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512:
> 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c
> *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan

All good on Slackware 14.2 and 15.0-rc1 no issues after 24 hours

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.

On 1 Oct 2021, at 15:41, stefan@eissing.org wrote:

> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!

+1 on CentOS7.

Regards,
Graham
—

On 2021-10-01 10:40, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/

Hmm, something is off. I can see the .htaccess file in the directory listing.
I suspect a directive is missing in the config.

Cheers,
K. C.

--
regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek KeyID 0x172380A011EF4944
Key fingerprint = 8A55 70C1 BD85 D34E ADBC 386C 1723 80A0 11EF 4944

/*
Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness
await thee at its end.
*/

+1 debian 11

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 16:41, stefan@eissing.org <stefan@eissing.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan

+1 Windows

> Op 1 okt. 2021 om 16:41 heeft stefan@eissing.org het volgende geschreven:
> ?Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan

I count 10 +1 votes for release and none against. I will go ahead and start preparing it.

Thanks to everyone for putting in the time on such a short notice!

Kind Regards,
Stefan

> Am 01.10.2021 um 16:40 schrieb stefan@eissing.org:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
> sha512: 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/candidate-2.4.50-rc1.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan

On 10/4/21 04:01, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
> I count 10 +1 votes for release and none against. I will go ahead and start preparing it.
>
> Thanks to everyone for putting in the time on such a short notice!
>

Looks good :

https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/Announcement2.4.html

However https://httpd.apache.org/ seems to still say 2.4.49 there.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

> Am 04.10.2021 um 21:59 schrieb Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>:
>
> On 10/4/21 04:01, stefan@eissing.org wrote:
>> I count 10 +1 votes for release and none against. I will go ahead and start preparing it.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone for putting in the time on such a short notice!
>>
>
> Looks good :
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
>
> However https://httpd.apache.org/ seems to still say 2.4.49 there.

Yes, we are giving mirrors always a day to sync the new tarballs before we send the announce and website update out.

Thanks for checking!

Kind Regards,
Stefan

>
>
> --
> Dennis Clarke
> RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
> UNIX and Linux spoken
> GreyBeard and suspenders optional