Mailing List Archive

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think that we want to release them. I am fine with omitting trunk from the path. Anyone objected to
>
> svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/
>
> ?

+1

Regards;
Yann.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65439

whoops, looks like the manual links from for the following are not working:

https://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
https://httpd.apache.org/mod_cgid/

Daniel, do you recall how this worked before? Maybe we lost some of
this extra content when you moved where httpd.apache.org points?


On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:15 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that we want to release them. I am fine with omitting trunk from the path. Anyone objected to
> >
> > svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/
> >
> > ?
>
> +1
>
> Regards;
> Yann.



--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

On 07/07/2021 14.14, Eric Covener wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
>
> whoops, looks like the manual links from for the following are not working:
>
> https://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
> https://httpd.apache.org/mod_cgid/
>
> Daniel, do you recall how this worked before? Maybe we lost some of
> this extra content when you moved where httpd.apache.org points?

I know where it originally pointed too, and I'll try to weave that into
the new site checkout. Should apply within 30 minutes.

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:15 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think that we want to release them. I am fine with omitting trunk from the path. Anyone objected to
>>>
>>> svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards;
>> Yann.
>
>
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener@gmail.com
>

On 7/5/21 9:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 6/30/21 11:40 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:50 AM Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org <mailto:rpluem@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>> I guess he talks about
>>
>> # Get the tooling
>> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools tools
>>
>> I think we should find a new location for this as this is not really site related.
>> How about
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/trunk
>>
>> (svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/trunk)
>>
>>
>> If we don't intend to make *releases* of these tools, then I recommend dropping "trunk", and just call it .../httpd/dev-tools/ 
>>
>> IMO, trunk/tags/branches ("TTB") should only be used in relation to artifacts that will be packaged/released by the Foundation.
>
> I don't think that we want to release them. I am fine with omitting trunk from the path. Anyone objected to
>
> svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/
>
> ?

Done as r1891502.

Regards

Rüdiger

Le 02/07/2021 à 18:57, Dave Fisher a écrit :
>
>
>> On Jul 1, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/1/21 10:49 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Le 01/07/2021 à 18:37, Dave Fisher a écrit :
>>>> I see that there is already a PR to fix the modules hyperlink. Should this be applied
>>>
>>> From my point of view, no.
>>> But /modules/ needs some clean-up.
>>>
>>>> and the ASF Pelican version of httpd.apache.org be put into production in 24 hours?
>>>
>>> Still, from my point of view, +1.
>>
>> +1
>
> The migrated httpd-site is now in production. Enjoy!
>

Hi,
when a PULL request is generated, it is forwarded to @dev. Same when it
is accepted.
This is just fine for me.

However, when one directly modify within apache/httpd-site on GitHub,
apparently, no notification is sent.

I think that is would be useful to also have these changes sent
somewhere so that others know that there is some activity (and
potentially fix/improve things, should it be only typo)

Is it possible?
Do you share this point of view?

CJ

> Regards,
> Dave
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rüdiger
>>
>>
>
>

On 16/07/2021 22.45, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
> when a PULL request is generated, it is forwarded to @dev. Same when it
> is accepted.
> This is just fine for me.
>
> However, when one directly modify within apache/httpd-site on GitHub,
> apparently, no notification is sent.
>
> I think that is would be useful to also have these changes sent
> somewhere so that others know that there is some activity (and
> potentially fix/improve things, should it be only typo)
>
> Is it possible?
> Do you share this point of view?

Yeah, this was actually added by Dave already, but not applied due to a
timing issue. I've prodded the .asf.yaml file now, and things should be
good.

>
> CJ
>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Rüdiger
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>