There was some discussion on this before... I think there was a general
consensus that a cache size of 200 would cover just about everyone.
This definitely seemed to be the break-even point for sunsite, based on
a scan of a few hundred thousand entries. Anything much bigger just
seemed to waste space; if you want to do the real right thing, I have a
perl script to calculate hit-rates based on CLF files, but that's
probably a little excessive for a Makefile :-)
Simon // This Message Composed By Voice
On Fri, 21 Apr 1995, David Robinson wrote:
> > So what patche(s) need to be added ?
>
> Did everyone really have no opinion on the size of the nameserver cache?
>
> David.
>
>