Mailing List Archive

On Mon, 17 Apr 1995, Robert S. Thau wrote:
> One typographical quibble --- the use of <b>oldface to quote the code
> sections is a bit different from my own usual style (I generally use
> <code> for these sections, which shows up in most browsers as
> some fixed-width typewriter font). I could certainly live with this;
> I just want to make sure there's a consensus before we settle on this
> as a house style.

Definitely, go for <code>. That's what it means semantically, anyways.

Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/

> Looks very good --- the discussion of ServerType, Port, User and Group
> should probably be ultimately cross-referenced to separate documents
> which walk the user through setting it up under inetd and standalone
> modes, respectively, but all in due time...

While we sit and wait for bug reports on the first beta, we can
work on the docs.

> One typographical quibble --- the use of <b>oldface to quote the code
> sections is a bit different from my own usual style (I generally use
> <code> for these sections, which shows up in most browsers as

I just tried <code> (for the first time). It looked crap with my
netscape. I couldn't tell it from the rest of the text.

<B><CODE>.. </CODE></B> might work though.

>
> I just wrote a html description of httpd.conf
>
> http://apache.org/apache/docs/httpd.conf.html
>
> (writeable by the group - so feel free to correct it)
>
> We could probably do with similar docs for the other conf
> files.
>
> any takers ?
>
> Randy, are we going to switch to a new Makefile ?

I have fixed up most of the problems with the Makefile
I submitted. I will have something later tonight or
tomorrow.

I was working through documenting srm.conf and came across

AddType

Is this a leftover from some pre mime.types version.

Does it serve any purpose other than add a type in exactly
the same way as in mime.type


?

From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 95 13:24:37 MDT

I just wrote a html description of httpd.conf

http://apache.org/apache/docs/httpd.conf.html

(writeable by the group - so feel free to correct it)

Looks very good --- the discussion of ServerType, Port, User and Group
should probably be ultimately cross-referenced to separate documents
which walk the user through setting it up under inetd and standalone
modes, respectively, but all in due time...

One typographical quibble --- the use of <b>oldface to quote the code
sections is a bit different from my own usual style (I generally use
<code> for these sections, which shows up in most browsers as
some fixed-width typewriter font). I could certainly live with this;
I just want to make sure there's a consensus before we settle on this
as a house style.

rst

srm.conf documentation online.

I'll leave access.conf to someone else.