Mailing List Archive

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225

--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Giovanni Bechis from comment #1)
> Created attachment 37815 [details]
> error 505 fix
>
> This diff fixes the issue, I wonder if there is a better method to check for
> http protocol version.

I don't like the patch because there could be 3rd party modules implementing
later versions of HTTP. Please see also

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra41dbcfc579d04887cc0644fc6803f0ae0f154291c058f52aee1c4df%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E

and the whole thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red499ac4750b88e5943c25abb86434c59dfff4d4f386ffc53742755d%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225

--- Comment #3 from WebTestingRL <webtestingsrl@gmail.com> ---
Maybe a variable that says if the protocol is supported or not? So, if a module
would be created for > http2, it can mention if protocol is supported or not.

like r->protocol_supported or something of that kind.

That could also be that the associated modules with the protocols would set
this variable.

Or just check if the protocol is HTTP, and the version is > 0.9, and send the
status there.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org